A comparative study of the epithelial regeneration capacities of two biomaterials in vitro
The morphology and cellular functions of oral epithelial cells differed between GPF and CM. Both materials are capable of promoting epithelial regeneration; however, GPF is more conducive to functional stratification of newly formed epithelium, while CM holds a more sustained effect on epithelial proliferation.
Authors
- Zhongqi Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9801-8713)
- Dino Tur (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8912-8817)
- Christian Behm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-3200)
- Xiaohui Rausch‐Fan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8010-1914)
- Zhiwei Tian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7662-2945)
- Oleh Andrukhov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-2142)
- Marco Aoqi Rausch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4318-0921)
- Hassan Ali Shokoohi-Tabrizi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1816-3436)
Institutions
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Oral Health
- Published
- 2025-04-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06026-x
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.02
Funders
- Universität Wien
- Medizinische Universität Wien