Factorial Structure and Measurement Invariance of the General Atitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Scale for University Students

The study aims to investigate the factorial structure (FS) and measurement invariance (MI) of the General Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) on a sample of students from Taif University. The instrument used was the GAAIS developed by [1] and translated by the researcher. The scale was administered to a sample of 461 university students. The study results indicated that the scale's structure aligned with the confirmatory factor analysis model, with fit indices demonstrating good fit: (χ^2⁄df=611.77⁄169=3.62), Good of fit Index (GFI) = 0.855, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.837, and Root Mean square of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.075. These results confirm the construct validity and the scale's suitability for the data. The composite reliability coefficients were 0.828 and 0.869, and Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients were 0.832 and 0.869 for the positive sub-dimensions (opportunities, benefits, societal and personal utility, and positive emotions) and the negative sub-dimensions (fears and negative emotions), respectively. Additionally, the study confirms configural, metric, scalar, and residual invariance across the male and female study groups. The results confirmed that the scale has high reliability and validity and is unbiased regarding the gender variable. The study also confirms the suitability of the instrument for measuring general attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) among university students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qubahan Academic Journal
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n2a1672
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factorial Structure and Measurement Invariance of the General Atitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Scale for University Students

Mohammed Mosa AlShamrani
2 citations
Qubahan Academic Journal
Education and Learning Interventions
6.49
article

Factorial Structure and Measurement Invariance of the General Atitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Scale for University Students

Mohammed Mosa AlShamrani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the factorial structure (FS) and measurement invariance (MI) of the General Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) on a sample of students from Taif University. The instrument used was the GAAIS developed by [1] and translated by the researcher. The scale was administered to a sample of 461 university students. The study results indicated that the scale's structure aligned with the confirmatory factor analysis model, with fit indices demonstrating good fit: (χ^2⁄df=611.77⁄169=3.62), Good of fit Index (GFI) = 0.855, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.837, and Root Mean square of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.075. These results confirm the construct validity and the scale's suitability for the data. The composite reliability coefficients were 0.828 and 0.869, and Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients were 0.832 and 0.869 for the positive sub-dimensions (opportunities, benefits, societal and personal utility, and positive emotions) and the negative sub-dimensions (fears and negative emotions), respectively. Additionally, the study confirms configural, metric, scalar, and residual invariance across the male and female study groups. The results confirmed that the scale has high reliability and validity and is unbiased regarding the gender variable. The study also confirms the suitability of the instrument for measuring general attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) among university students.

Qubahan Academic JournalVol. 5(2)
Taif University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education and Learning Interventions
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.