Adjuvant VaccInation After Conization for the Treatment for CervicAL Dysplasia

This study aimed to evaluate the role of adjuvant HPV vaccination in women undergoing conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. This prospective study assessed factors influencing recurrence in patients undergoing conization for high-grade cervical dysplasia. After conization, patients were counseled on the potential benefits of vaccination. We compared outcomes between two groups: women who underwent conization with adjuvant human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and observation versus conization with observation only. Data from 281 patients were analyzed, comprising 168 (59.8%) patients in the conization-only group and 113 (40.2%) patients in the conization-plus vaccination group. Vaccinated patients were younger than nonvaccinated patients (38 vs. 45 years, P < 0.001). Positive surgical margins were more frequently observed in the vaccinated group compared with the nonvaccinated group (9.7 vs. 3.6%; P = 0.038). Median follow-up was shorter in the vaccinated group, although this difference was not statistically significant (24.9 vs. 27.8 months; P = 0.395). The risk of developing HPV-related lesions was similar between the vaccinated and nonvaccinated groups ( P = 0.594, log-rank test). Likewise, the need for reconization did not differ significantly between the groups ( P = 0.593, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis showed no significant impact of HPV vaccination on postoperative outcomes [hazard ratio (HR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-1.68) for any lesion; HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.47-1.73 for reconization]. This study indicates that adjuvant HPV vaccination does not significantly affect short-term outcomes in women undergoing conization for cervical dysplasia. Ongoing randomized trials will provide more robust evidence to clarify the role of adjuvant vaccination in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Cancer Prevention
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/cej.0000000000000971
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjuvant VaccInation After Conization for the Treatment for CervicAL Dysplasia

Francesca De Maria, Giorgio Bogani, Carlotta Caia, Francesco Sopracordevole et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Cancer Prevention
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
1.35
article

Adjuvant VaccInation After Conization for the Treatment for CervicAL Dysplasia

Francesca De Maria, Giorgio Bogani, Carlotta Caia, Francesco Sopracordevole, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Fabio Ghezzi, Giovanni Corso, Jvan Casarin, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Camilla Valsecchi, Valentina Chiappa, Giovanni Scambia, Andrea Ciavattini, Francesco Raspagliesi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the role of adjuvant HPV vaccination in women undergoing conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. This prospective study assessed factors influencing recurrence in patients undergoing conization for high-grade cervical dysplasia. After conization, patients were counseled on the potential benefits of vaccination. We compared outcomes between two groups: women who underwent conization with adjuvant human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and observation versus conization with observation only. Data from 281 patients were analyzed, comprising 168 (59.8%) patients in the conization-only group and 113 (40.2%) patients in the conization-plus vaccination group. Vaccinated patients were younger than nonvaccinated patients (38 vs. 45 years, P < 0.001). Positive surgical margins were more frequently observed in the vaccinated group compared with the nonvaccinated group (9.7 vs. 3.6%; P = 0.038). Median follow-up was shorter in the vaccinated group, although this difference was not statistically significant (24.9 vs. 27.8 months; P = 0.395). The risk of developing HPV-related lesions was similar between the vaccinated and nonvaccinated groups ( P = 0.594, log-rank test). Likewise, the need for reconization did not differ significantly between the groups ( P = 0.593, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis showed no significant impact of HPV vaccination on postoperative outcomes [hazard ratio (HR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-1.68) for any lesion; HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.47-1.73 for reconization]. This study indicates that adjuvant HPV vaccination does not significantly affect short-term outcomes in women undergoing conization for cervical dysplasia. Ongoing randomized trials will provide more robust evidence to clarify the role of adjuvant vaccination in this setting.

European Journal of Cancer PreventionVol. 35(3)
University of Insubria (IT), Marche Polytechnic University (IT), University of Udine (IT), University of Milan (IT), Ospedale Filippo Del Ponte Varese (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine (IT), Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), European Institute of Oncology (IT), Misericordia University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.