How spousal bereavement shapes life satisfaction: Stability and change across historical time

Spousal bereavement is one of the most disruptive life events encountered during adulthood. However, we know little about whether and how the impacts of spousal loss on well-being have changed over the past decades. To examine such historical shifts, we applied area under the curve (AUC) metrics and latent basis growth models to multi-year within-person longitudinal change data from 2,044 participants ( M age at event = 65.73 years, 70% women) obtained annually across almost four decades from the German Socio-Economic Panel (1984–2020). We found that compared to the 1980s and 1990s, those experiencing spousal loss in the 2000s and 2010s showed less severe declines in well-being between 5 years before and after the loss. This improvement was driven mostly by shallower anticipatory declines and faster recovery in the adaptation phase (both by about 0.1 SD per 10 years of historical time), rather than changes in the immediate reaction phase. We found little to no evidence that the role of socio-demographic, health, and social factors as moderators of bereavement has changed across the past 40 years. We take our findings to highlight that both historical context and individual difference factors are shaping how people experience critical life events such as bereavement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Personality
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070251336534
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How spousal bereavement shapes life satisfaction: Stability and change across historical time

Denis Gerstorf, David Richter, Gert G. Wagner, Urmimala Ghose et al.
European Journal of Personality
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

How spousal bereavement shapes life satisfaction: Stability and change across historical time

Denis Gerstorf, David Richter, Gert G. Wagner, Urmimala Ghose, Frank J. Infurna, Nilàm Ram, Michael Dominik Krämer
article en

Abstract

Spousal bereavement is one of the most disruptive life events encountered during adulthood. However, we know little about whether and how the impacts of spousal loss on well-being have changed over the past decades. To examine such historical shifts, we applied area under the curve (AUC) metrics and latent basis growth models to multi-year within-person longitudinal change data from 2,044 participants ( M age at event = 65.73 years, 70% women) obtained annually across almost four decades from the German Socio-Economic Panel (1984–2020). We found that compared to the 1980s and 1990s, those experiencing spousal loss in the 2000s and 2010s showed less severe declines in well-being between 5 years before and after the loss. This improvement was driven mostly by shallower anticipatory declines and faster recovery in the adaptation phase (both by about 0.1 SD per 10 years of historical time), rather than changes in the immediate reaction phase. We found little to no evidence that the role of socio-demographic, health, and social factors as moderators of bereavement has changed across the past 40 years. We take our findings to highlight that both historical context and individual difference factors are shaping how people experience critical life events such as bereavement.

European Journal of PersonalityVol. 40(2)
German Institute for Economic Research (DE), University of Zurich (CH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Singapore-HUJ Alliance for Research and Enterprise (SG), Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE), Science Health Allied Research Education (IN), SHARE (US), Federal Institute for Population Research (DE), Arizona State University (US), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.