Should We Reconsider RNNs for Time-Series Forecasting?

(1) Background: In recent years, Transformer-based models have dominated the time-series forecasting domain, overshadowing recurrent neural networks (RNNs) such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). While Transformers demonstrate superior performance, their high computational cost limits their practical application in resource-constrained settings. (2) Methods: In this paper, we reconsider RNNs—specifically the GRU architecture—as an efficient alternative to time-series forecasting by leveraging this architecture’s sequential representation capability to capture cross-channel dependencies effectively. Our model also utilizes a feed-forward layer right after the GRU module to represent temporal dependencies, and aggregates it with the GRU layers to predict future values of a given time-series. (3) Results and conclusions: Our extensive experiments conducted on different real-world datasets show that our inverted GRU (iGRU) model achieves promising results in terms of error metrics and memory efficiency, challenging or surpassing state-of-the-art models on various benchmarks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6050090
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should We Reconsider RNNs for Time-Series Forecasting?

Mounir Boukadoum, Abdoulaye Baniré Diallo, Vahid Naghashi
6 citations
AI
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
8.91
article

Should We Reconsider RNNs for Time-Series Forecasting?

Mounir Boukadoum, Abdoulaye Baniré Diallo, Vahid Naghashi
article en
6 citations

Abstract

(1) Background: In recent years, Transformer-based models have dominated the time-series forecasting domain, overshadowing recurrent neural networks (RNNs) such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). While Transformers demonstrate superior performance, their high computational cost limits their practical application in resource-constrained settings. (2) Methods: In this paper, we reconsider RNNs—specifically the GRU architecture—as an efficient alternative to time-series forecasting by leveraging this architecture’s sequential representation capability to capture cross-channel dependencies effectively. Our model also utilizes a feed-forward layer right after the GRU module to represent temporal dependencies, and aggregates it with the GRU layers to predict future values of a given time-series. (3) Results and conclusions: Our extensive experiments conducted on different real-world datasets show that our inverted GRU (iGRU) model achieves promising results in terms of error metrics and memory efficiency, challenging or surpassing state-of-the-art models on various benchmarks.

AIVol. 6(5)
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
8.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.