Analysis of the 20 kV Distribution Network System Reliability Index Technically and Economically Using the Section Technique Method and RNEA at the Margorukun Feeder

The growing demand for electrical energy in line with Indonesia's economic growth and societal welfare requires a reliable distribution system. To support distribution in industrial, urban, business, and daily life contexts, a dependable system is needed to channel electrical energy to consumers. This study aims to analyze the reliability of the 20 kV distribution system using the Section Technique method and the RNEA method, from both technical and economic aspects. The assessment is conducted based on the SPLN 68-2:1986 and IEEE 1366-2003 standards, focusing on the Margorukun feeder in 2023. The calculations show that the SAIFI value using the Section Technique method is 1.14 times/customer/year, which meets the SPLN 68-2:1986 standard and is close to the IEEE 1366:2003 standard. Meanwhile, the RNEA method results in a SAIFI of 2.66 times/customer/year, which meets the SPLN 68-2:1986 standard but does not reach the IEEE 1366:2003 standard. For SAIDI, the value obtained from the Section Technique method is 4.47 hours/year, while the RNEA method reaches 6.84 hours/year; both meet the SPLN 68-2:1986 standard but do not meet the IEEE 1366-2003 standard. In terms of CAIDI, the Section Technique method shows a value of 3.92 hours/customer/year, better than the RNEA method at 2.57 hours/customer/year; however, both do not meet the IEEE 1366-2003 standard. The evaluation of ASAI and ASUI indicates that the Section Technique method is superior in service availability and reliability. Further analysis related to EENS and AENS shows that the Section Technique method is more effective, with EENS values of 49.842935 and AENS of 0.011431, compared to the RNEA method, which reaches 55.420674 and 0.012711, respectively. The economic losses calculated from the Section Technique method amount to IDR 72,008,089.35, while the RNEA method shows higher losses of IDR 80,068,247.50. The results of this study indicate that the Section Technique method is more reliable and effective in evaluating the reliability of the Margorukun feeder compared to the RNEA method, although both do not fully meet the IEEE 1366:2003 standard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INAJEEE Indonesian Journal of Electrical and Eletronics Engineering
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26740/inajeee.v8n1.p32-40
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the 20 kV Distribution Network System Reliability Index Technically and Economically Using the Section Technique Method and RNEA at the Margorukun Feeder

Tri Wrahatnolo, Moch Arfi Almi
2 citations
INAJEEE Indonesian Journal of Electrical and Eletronics Engineering
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
0.73
article

Analysis of the 20 kV Distribution Network System Reliability Index Technically and Economically Using the Section Technique Method and RNEA at the Margorukun Feeder

Tri Wrahatnolo, Moch Arfi Almi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The growing demand for electrical energy in line with Indonesia's economic growth and societal welfare requires a reliable distribution system. To support distribution in industrial, urban, business, and daily life contexts, a dependable system is needed to channel electrical energy to consumers. This study aims to analyze the reliability of the 20 kV distribution system using the Section Technique method and the RNEA method, from both technical and economic aspects. The assessment is conducted based on the SPLN 68-2:1986 and IEEE 1366-2003 standards, focusing on the Margorukun feeder in 2023. The calculations show that the SAIFI value using the Section Technique method is 1.14 times/customer/year, which meets the SPLN 68-2:1986 standard and is close to the IEEE 1366:2003 standard. Meanwhile, the RNEA method results in a SAIFI of 2.66 times/customer/year, which meets the SPLN 68-2:1986 standard but does not reach the IEEE 1366:2003 standard. For SAIDI, the value obtained from the Section Technique method is 4.47 hours/year, while the RNEA method reaches 6.84 hours/year; both meet the SPLN 68-2:1986 standard but do not meet the IEEE 1366-2003 standard. In terms of CAIDI, the Section Technique method shows a value of 3.92 hours/customer/year, better than the RNEA method at 2.57 hours/customer/year; however, both do not meet the IEEE 1366-2003 standard. The evaluation of ASAI and ASUI indicates that the Section Technique method is superior in service availability and reliability. Further analysis related to EENS and AENS shows that the Section Technique method is more effective, with EENS values of 49.842935 and AENS of 0.011431, compared to the RNEA method, which reaches 55.420674 and 0.012711, respectively. The economic losses calculated from the Section Technique method amount to IDR 72,008,089.35, while the RNEA method shows higher losses of IDR 80,068,247.50. The results of this study indicate that the Section Technique method is more reliable and effective in evaluating the reliability of the Margorukun feeder compared to the RNEA method, although both do not fully meet the IEEE 1366:2003 standard.

INAJEEE Indonesian Journal of Electrical and Eletronics EngineeringVol. 8(1)
Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.