Ecological Benefits and Structure of Mixed vs. Pure Forest Plantations in Subtropical China

Numerous studies on biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) have shown that mixed plantations can improve the ecological benefits of forest ecosystems. However, few studies have employed a multi-dimensional approach to study the integrated ecological benefits of mixed plantations. This study aims to evaluate the stand characteristics and ecological benefits of different forest types by examining various ecological indicators, including trees, shrubs, herbs, and soil properties. Focusing on typical mixed broadleaf–conifer plantations (MBCPs), mixed coniferous plantations (MCPs), and pure Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook plantations (PCLs) at the Guiyang Plantation Farm, Suichang, we analyzed growth performance, spatial structure, understory vegetation diversity, and soil physicochemical properties across these forest types. For each forest type, one 100 × 100 m plot was established. Within each plot, five 20 × 20 m subplots were selected for investigation. Our results show that the aboveground biomass of MCPs is higher than that of MBCPs and PCLs, with increases of 46.58% and 177.29%, respectively. Furthermore, both mixed plantations offer better stand structure compared to pure plantations. In mixed plantations, the MBCPs exhibited a high degree of niche overlap, indicating that interspecific competition outweighed complementarity, whereas the MCPs demonstrated a more favorable stand structure. MCPs also exhibit significantly greater understory vegetation diversity compared to MBCPs and PCLs, with increases of 4.19%–13.04% and 10.34%–36.99%, respectively. Additionally, mixed plantations enhance soil moisture retention and fertility. With the onset of global warming and the increasing prevalence of extreme weather events, the establishment of artificial mixed plantations is an essential strategy to address climate change and enhance the ecological benefits of plantations.