Paradox in Practice: Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevalence and Reporting among Construction Workers in Kuwait and Denmark

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a significant health issue among construction workers, with prevalence influenced by factors such as personal demographics, exposure to work risk factors, and working conditions. This study addresses a research gap by comparing WMSD prevalence between Kuwait and Denmark; two countries with contrasting working conditions. Data were collected from 117 workers in Kuwait and 47 in Denmark using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Results showed that 78.72% of Danish workers reported discomfort in at least one body part compared to 52.14% in Kuwait, despite Denmark’s comparatively better working conditions. Additionally, absenteeism due to WMSDs was higher in Denmark (29.79%) than in Kuwait (9.40%). This paradoxical finding led to further analysis using logistic regression that indicated country was a significant predictor of WMSD reporting (OR=3.38, p<0.05), with Danish workers being substantially more likely to report WMSDs than their Kuwaiti counterparts. This suggested potential underreporting in Kuwait, prompting an investigation into organizational, economic, and cultural factors that may influence reporting behaviors. Specifically, Kuwait’s high power distance and uncertainty avoidance may contribute to miscommunication and underreporting, while Denmark’s individualistic culture encourages transparency. This study makes two primary contributions to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by: (1) providing the first cross cultural analysis of WMSD prevalence between Gulf Cooperation Council and Nordic construction sectors, and (2) demonstrating that country factors—likely cultural in nature—are stronger predictors of WMSD reporting than individual worker personal demographics. For Kuwait, this implies a need for improved reporting systems, greater worker empowerment, and enhanced working conditions, while Denmark would benefit from a focus on strengthening preventive measures. Future research should further explore the role of cultural influences on WMSD reporting. This study underscores the importance of culturally informed approaches in developing effective workplace health and safety strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-15899
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paradox in Practice: Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevalence and Reporting among Construction Workers in Kuwait and Denmark

Søren Wandahl, Mohamad Iyad Al‐Khiami, Søren Munch Lindhard
5 citations
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Occupational Health and Safety Research
7.70
article

Paradox in Practice: Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevalence and Reporting among Construction Workers in Kuwait and Denmark

Søren Wandahl, Mohamad Iyad Al‐Khiami, Søren Munch Lindhard
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a significant health issue among construction workers, with prevalence influenced by factors such as personal demographics, exposure to work risk factors, and working conditions. This study addresses a research gap by comparing WMSD prevalence between Kuwait and Denmark; two countries with contrasting working conditions. Data were collected from 117 workers in Kuwait and 47 in Denmark using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Results showed that 78.72% of Danish workers reported discomfort in at least one body part compared to 52.14% in Kuwait, despite Denmark’s comparatively better working conditions. Additionally, absenteeism due to WMSDs was higher in Denmark (29.79%) than in Kuwait (9.40%). This paradoxical finding led to further analysis using logistic regression that indicated country was a significant predictor of WMSD reporting (OR=3.38, p<0.05), with Danish workers being substantially more likely to report WMSDs than their Kuwaiti counterparts. This suggested potential underreporting in Kuwait, prompting an investigation into organizational, economic, and cultural factors that may influence reporting behaviors. Specifically, Kuwait’s high power distance and uncertainty avoidance may contribute to miscommunication and underreporting, while Denmark’s individualistic culture encourages transparency. This study makes two primary contributions to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by: (1) providing the first cross cultural analysis of WMSD prevalence between Gulf Cooperation Council and Nordic construction sectors, and (2) demonstrating that country factors—likely cultural in nature—are stronger predictors of WMSD reporting than individual worker personal demographics. For Kuwait, this implies a need for improved reporting systems, greater worker empowerment, and enhanced working conditions, while Denmark would benefit from a focus on strengthening preventive measures. Future research should further explore the role of cultural influences on WMSD reporting. This study underscores the importance of culturally informed approaches in developing effective workplace health and safety strategies.

Journal of Construction Engineering and ManagementVol. 151(7)
Aarhus University (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
7.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.