Improving Human Deception Detection Using Algorithmic Feedback

Can algorithms help people detect deception in high-stakes strategic interactions? Participants watching the preplay communication of contestants in the TV show Golden Balls display a limited ability to predict contestants’ behavior, whereas algorithms do significantly better. To increase participants’ accuracy, we provide them with algorithmic advice by flagging videos for which an algorithm predicts a high likelihood of cooperation or defection. We test how the effectiveness of flags depends on their timing. We show that participants rely significantly more on flags shown before they watch the videos than flags shown after they watch them. These findings show that the timing of algorithmic feedback is key for its adoption. This paper was accepted by Marie-Claire Villeval, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: Funding provided by an Innovation Grant for Inclusive Research Excellence at UC San Diego. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02792 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02792
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Human Deception Detection Using Algorithmic Feedback

Marta Serra-García, Uri Gneezy
1 citations
Management Science
Deception detection and forensic psychology
2.44
article

Improving Human Deception Detection Using Algorithmic Feedback

Marta Serra-García, Uri Gneezy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Can algorithms help people detect deception in high-stakes strategic interactions? Participants watching the preplay communication of contestants in the TV show Golden Balls display a limited ability to predict contestants’ behavior, whereas algorithms do significantly better. To increase participants’ accuracy, we provide them with algorithmic advice by flagging videos for which an algorithm predicts a high likelihood of cooperation or defection. We test how the effectiveness of flags depends on their timing. We show that participants rely significantly more on flags shown before they watch the videos than flags shown after they watch them. These findings show that the timing of algorithmic feedback is key for its adoption. This paper was accepted by Marie-Claire Villeval, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: Funding provided by an Innovation Grant for Inclusive Research Excellence at UC San Diego. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02792 .

Management ScienceVol. 71(12)
University of California San Diego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving Human Deception Detection Using Algorithmic Feedback — Marta Serra-García, Uri Gneezy · Management Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS