A Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Validation in 15,490 Brazilians Using Exome Sequencing

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Brazil has a highly admixed population. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have mostly been developed from European population studies, and their application to other populations is challenging. To assess the use of PRS for breast cancer (BC) risk in Brazil, we evaluated four PRSs in the Brazilian population. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed a Brazilian cohort composed of 6206 women with a history of breast cancer and 8878 unphenotyped adults as controls. Genomic variants were imputed from exomes, and scores were calculated for all samples. <b>Results:</b> After individuals with known pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in <i>BRCA1</i>, <i>BRCA2</i>, <i>PALB2</i>, <i>PTEN</i>, or <i>TP53</i> genes, and first-degree relatives of the probands were excluded, 5598 cases and 8767 controls remained. Four PRS models were compared, and PRS<sub>3820</sub> achieved the best performance, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.43 per standard deviation increase (<i>p</i> value < 0.001) and an OR of 1.88 (<i>p</i> value < 0.001) for the top decile. PRS<sub>3820</sub> also performed well for different ancestry groups: East Asian majority (OR 1.59, <i>p</i> value 0.004), Non-European majority (OR 1.45, <i>p</i> value < 0.001), and European majority (OR 1.43, <i>p</i> value < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Among the different PRSs, PRS<sub>313</sub> and PRS<sub>3820</sub> could be validated in our Brazilian cohort, with the latter exhibiting the best performance. While further clinical studies are necessary to guide clinical practice, this work represents an important step toward improving BC precision medicine in Brazil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091098
Citations
2
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Validation in 15,490 Brazilians Using Exome Sequencing

Flávia E. Rius, Júlia Salomão, David Schlesinger, Danilo Oliveira Imparato et al.
2 citations
Diagnostics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
3.63
article

A Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Validation in 15,490 Brazilians Using Exome Sequencing

Flávia E. Rius, Júlia Salomão, David Schlesinger, Danilo Oliveira Imparato, Dezheng Huo, Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira, Cleandra Gregório, Flávia Antunes, Renata Freitas, Renan W. Achjian, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Claudia Danielli Pereira Bertolacini, Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini, Lucas Mitsuo Taniguti, Simone Maistro, José Eduardo Krieger, Yonglan Zheng, Nathália Taniguti, Gabriel Gomes de Sousa, Juliana de Assis Silva Gomes, Laila Gallo, Eric Fukuyama, Iuri Ventura, Danilo Viana
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Brazil has a highly admixed population. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have mostly been developed from European population studies, and their application to other populations is challenging. To assess the use of PRS for breast cancer (BC) risk in Brazil, we evaluated four PRSs in the Brazilian population. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed a Brazilian cohort composed of 6206 women with a history of breast cancer and 8878 unphenotyped adults as controls. Genomic variants were imputed from exomes, and scores were calculated for all samples. <b>Results:</b> After individuals with known pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in <i>BRCA1</i>, <i>BRCA2</i>, <i>PALB2</i>, <i>PTEN</i>, or <i>TP53</i> genes, and first-degree relatives of the probands were excluded, 5598 cases and 8767 controls remained. Four PRS models were compared, and PRS<sub>3820</sub> achieved the best performance, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.43 per standard deviation increase (<i>p</i> value < 0.001) and an OR of 1.88 (<i>p</i> value < 0.001) for the top decile. PRS<sub>3820</sub> also performed well for different ancestry groups: East Asian majority (OR 1.59, <i>p</i> value 0.004), Non-European majority (OR 1.45, <i>p</i> value < 0.001), and European majority (OR 1.43, <i>p</i> value < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Among the different PRSs, PRS<sub>313</sub> and PRS<sub>3820</sub> could be validated in our Brazilian cohort, with the latter exhibiting the best performance. While further clinical studies are necessary to guide clinical practice, this work represents an important step toward improving BC precision medicine in Brazil.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(9)
Chicago Department of Public Health (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Chicago (US), University of Chicago Medical Center (US), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (BR), D’Or Institute for Research and Education (BR), Mendelics (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Cancer Genetics (United States) (US)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.