Definition of the Content Core of Synonymic Series of English-Language Terms in the Field of Construction Equipment

Introduction . This article is devoted to the definition of the content core of synonymous series of English-language terms in the field of construction equipment as one of the methods of studying this terminology system from the point of view of its features and structure. The relevance of the work is due to the growing need to study the terminology system “Construction equipment” in order to train specialists with competencies in the field of design, repair, modernization, and operation of construction machines arriving in the territory of the Russian Federation from abroad. The basis for conducting the study was also the lack of cognitive studies related to the terminology system “Construction equipment”. Methodology and sources . The methodological basis of the study was: a survey, corpus analysis, definitional analysis, comparative analysis. The author uses a quantitative approach to provide statistical data necessary to demonstrate some of the research results. This study is also based on the concepts of D.S. Lotte (in the field of synonymy in technical terminology), as well as I.K. Arkhipov (definition of the concept of “Content core”). The sources used were operating manuals for such types of construction equipment as Hydraulic excavator, front loader, excavator-loader. The survey was conducted on July 10, 2024, at the ATLET company (57 specialists with the necessary competencies in the field of construction equipment participated in the survey). Results and discussion . In the course of this study, the hypothesis: “If the content core of the selected dominant term of the synonymous series coincides with the content core of the entire synonymous series, then this fact can be the basis for defining this dominant as such” was not confirmed. Conclusion . The terminology system “Construction equipment” is poorly studied from the point of view of the cognitive approach at this stage. In this regard, various difficulties may be identified in the process of research, slowing down the process of finding an answer to the question about the nature and features of this terminology. This study is an attempt by the author to identify some contradictions that arise in the process of studying construction and technical terminology and to highlight them for a wide range of professionals whose area of interest includes cognitive terminology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-2-142-156
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Definition of the Content Core of Synonymic Series of English-Language Terms in the Field of Construction Equipment

Владимир Александрович Родин
Discourse
linguistics and terminology studies
article

Definition of the Content Core of Synonymic Series of English-Language Terms in the Field of Construction Equipment

Владимир Александрович Родин
article en

Abstract

Introduction . This article is devoted to the definition of the content core of synonymous series of English-language terms in the field of construction equipment as one of the methods of studying this terminology system from the point of view of its features and structure. The relevance of the work is due to the growing need to study the terminology system “Construction equipment” in order to train specialists with competencies in the field of design, repair, modernization, and operation of construction machines arriving in the territory of the Russian Federation from abroad. The basis for conducting the study was also the lack of cognitive studies related to the terminology system “Construction equipment”. Methodology and sources . The methodological basis of the study was: a survey, corpus analysis, definitional analysis, comparative analysis. The author uses a quantitative approach to provide statistical data necessary to demonstrate some of the research results. This study is also based on the concepts of D.S. Lotte (in the field of synonymy in technical terminology), as well as I.K. Arkhipov (definition of the concept of “Content core”). The sources used were operating manuals for such types of construction equipment as Hydraulic excavator, front loader, excavator-loader. The survey was conducted on July 10, 2024, at the ATLET company (57 specialists with the necessary competencies in the field of construction equipment participated in the survey). Results and discussion . In the course of this study, the hypothesis: “If the content core of the selected dominant term of the synonymous series coincides with the content core of the entire synonymous series, then this fact can be the basis for defining this dominant as such” was not confirmed. Conclusion . The terminology system “Construction equipment” is poorly studied from the point of view of the cognitive approach at this stage. In this regard, various difficulties may be identified in the process of research, slowing down the process of finding an answer to the question about the nature and features of this terminology. This study is an attempt by the author to identify some contradictions that arise in the process of studying construction and technical terminology and to highlight them for a wide range of professionals whose area of interest includes cognitive terminology.

DiscourseVol. 11(2)
Pushkin Leningrad State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
linguistics and terminology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.