MCDM-AHP and CODAS Collaboration Techniques for Selection of Expert Education Personnel

Educational progress is largely determined by human resources who have the best qualifications, with the ability of human resources to provide hope for educational development for a creative and potential future. The ability of human resources to create various variants of knowledge that can be developed to enlighten the progress of thinking through education to create expert education personnel. The aim of this research is to provide techniques to guarantee the quality of the selection process for expert education personnel for the competitive progress of mastering educational technology who are able to independently increase the creative and potential thinking of graduates. To achieve this, of course, strict collaboration techniques are needed in the selection process to obtain expert education personnel. The method proposed in this research is MCDM-AHP in collaboration with CODAS. These two methods can collaborate in providing guarantees for an optimal selection process for education personnel through eight selected assessment criteria and twelve alternatives. From the results obtained, the highest priority was obtained by ALT10 with a weight of 0.229. This gain goes through the stages of normalizing criteria and alternatives with the optimization results of both. With the research results that have been described in detail, the collaboration of the MCDM-AHP and CODAS methods can be used as a measuring tool for optimal assessment of the acquisition of decision support results and can be used as a comparison with other methods for measuring the level of optimization of results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SinkrOn
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i2.14182
Primary Topic
Competency Development and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MCDM-AHP and CODAS Collaboration Techniques for Selection of Expert Education Personnel

Akmaludin Akmaludin, Kudiantoro Widianto, Adhi Dharma Suriyanto
SinkrOn
Competency Development and Evaluation
article

MCDM-AHP and CODAS Collaboration Techniques for Selection of Expert Education Personnel

Akmaludin Akmaludin, Kudiantoro Widianto, Adhi Dharma Suriyanto
article en

Abstract

Educational progress is largely determined by human resources who have the best qualifications, with the ability of human resources to provide hope for educational development for a creative and potential future. The ability of human resources to create various variants of knowledge that can be developed to enlighten the progress of thinking through education to create expert education personnel. The aim of this research is to provide techniques to guarantee the quality of the selection process for expert education personnel for the competitive progress of mastering educational technology who are able to independently increase the creative and potential thinking of graduates. To achieve this, of course, strict collaboration techniques are needed in the selection process to obtain expert education personnel. The method proposed in this research is MCDM-AHP in collaboration with CODAS. These two methods can collaborate in providing guarantees for an optimal selection process for education personnel through eight selected assessment criteria and twelve alternatives. From the results obtained, the highest priority was obtained by ALT10 with a weight of 0.229. This gain goes through the stages of normalizing criteria and alternatives with the optimization results of both. With the research results that have been described in detail, the collaboration of the MCDM-AHP and CODAS methods can be used as a measuring tool for optimal assessment of the acquisition of decision support results and can be used as a comparison with other methods for measuring the level of optimization of results.

SinkrOnVol. 9(2)
Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Competency Development and Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.