The impact of the Crimea annexation on agricultural trade: A structural gravity approach

Abstract We examine the impact of the 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea on global agricultural trade flows. Using a structural gravity model with a Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimator and intra-country sales, we differentiate the effects of the war from those of the sanctions on trade. We estimate conditional General Equilibrium PPML counterfactual scenarios and apply a “conventional two-step approach” to assess trade potential for Russia, Ukraine and European Union members. Our results suggest that while both Russia’s and Ukraine’s trade flows benefited during the post-annexation period, sanctions had a negative impact, with Russia experiencing more severe effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Review of Agricultural Economics
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbaf010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of the Crimea annexation on agricultural trade: A structural gravity approach

Dimitrios Dadakas, Renáta Pitoňáková, Evangelos Ioannidis
1 citations
European Review of Agricultural Economics
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
3.13
article

The impact of the Crimea annexation on agricultural trade: A structural gravity approach

Dimitrios Dadakas, Renáta Pitoňáková, Evangelos Ioannidis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We examine the impact of the 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea on global agricultural trade flows. Using a structural gravity model with a Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimator and intra-country sales, we differentiate the effects of the war from those of the sanctions on trade. We estimate conditional General Equilibrium PPML counterfactual scenarios and apply a “conventional two-step approach” to assess trade potential for Russia, Ukraine and European Union members. Our results suggest that while both Russia’s and Ukraine’s trade flows benefited during the post-annexation period, sanctions had a negative impact, with Russia experiencing more severe effects.

European Review of Agricultural EconomicsVol. 52(3)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Bratislava University of Economics and Business (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of the Crimea annexation on agricultural trade: A structural gravity approach — Dimitrios Dadakas, Renáta Pitoňáková, et al. · European Review of Agricultural Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS