Evaluation of lateral and axial forces in atrophic maxilla with angled pterygoid implant using three dimensional finite element analysis

The purpose of this research is to identify the angle of pterygoid implant that have minimum equivalent stress and minimum equivalent strain using the finite element analysis (FEA) technique, based on the Frankfort Horizontal Plane. A three-dimensional maxilla model was reconstructed from a CT scan of a toothless patient. This model includes the cancellous and cortical bone. The facial region of a 58-year-old male patient with an atrophic maxilla and an angled pterygoid implant was imaged with CT in DICOM format. The raw DICOM data had a 0.3-mm section thickness. The MIMICS program created a three-dimensional model of the sections bone tissue. A dental implant with a diameter of 3.5 mm, a length of 16 mm, a conical shape, and a private thread design was placed in the pterygoid bone using SOLIDWORKS. This study investigated at how to place a pterygoid dental implant using both monocortical (at the end of the crest and cancellous bone) and bicortical (between the crest and basal bone) methods at 45, 55, 65, 75, and 85° relative to the Frankfort Horizontal Plane. Ten models were used for this study. CAD models were sent to ANSYS for loading. Boundaries of maxilla before force application are fixed from the zygomatic region. Human mastication was simulated using three load situations with the following characteristics, 150-N axial loading and 50-N lateral loading separately and 50-N lateral loading and 150-N axial loading simultaneously. Based on our studies and according to the Frankfort Horizontal Plane, placing the pterygoid implant at an 85° angle is the best in terms of bone stress. In terms of bone strain, it was found that placing the implant at 75 and 85° angles monocortically and bicortically respectively has the best outcome. This research concluded that an angle of 85° exhibits the minimum stress and strain effects on the surrounding bone tissue and the implant's structural integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adoms.2025.100545
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of lateral and axial forces in atrophic maxilla with angled pterygoid implant using three dimensional finite element analysis

Ahmet Arslan, İbrahim Mutlu, Thair Mahroq, Zakaria Al Joulaji
Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Evaluation of lateral and axial forces in atrophic maxilla with angled pterygoid implant using three dimensional finite element analysis

Ahmet Arslan, İbrahim Mutlu, Thair Mahroq, Zakaria Al Joulaji
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify the angle of pterygoid implant that have minimum equivalent stress and minimum equivalent strain using the finite element analysis (FEA) technique, based on the Frankfort Horizontal Plane. A three-dimensional maxilla model was reconstructed from a CT scan of a toothless patient. This model includes the cancellous and cortical bone. The facial region of a 58-year-old male patient with an atrophic maxilla and an angled pterygoid implant was imaged with CT in DICOM format. The raw DICOM data had a 0.3-mm section thickness. The MIMICS program created a three-dimensional model of the sections bone tissue. A dental implant with a diameter of 3.5 mm, a length of 16 mm, a conical shape, and a private thread design was placed in the pterygoid bone using SOLIDWORKS. This study investigated at how to place a pterygoid dental implant using both monocortical (at the end of the crest and cancellous bone) and bicortical (between the crest and basal bone) methods at 45, 55, 65, 75, and 85° relative to the Frankfort Horizontal Plane. Ten models were used for this study. CAD models were sent to ANSYS for loading. Boundaries of maxilla before force application are fixed from the zygomatic region. Human mastication was simulated using three load situations with the following characteristics, 150-N axial loading and 50-N lateral loading separately and 50-N lateral loading and 150-N axial loading simultaneously. Based on our studies and according to the Frankfort Horizontal Plane, placing the pterygoid implant at an 85° angle is the best in terms of bone stress. In terms of bone strain, it was found that placing the implant at 75 and 85° angles monocortically and bicortically respectively has the best outcome. This research concluded that an angle of 85° exhibits the minimum stress and strain effects on the surrounding bone tissue and the implant's structural integrity.

Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 18
Yeditepe University (TR), Al-Quds University (PS), Yeditepe University Hospital (TR), Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.