Learning Styles’ Role in Enhancing Metacognition and Biology Achievement Using RQAAD

Modern education requires students to develop high metacognitive awareness for effective learning management, which supports applying the RQAAD model based on learning styles. This study investigates the effect of learning styles on metacognitive awareness and biology learning outcomes using a quasi-experimental method with a pre-test-post-test design at SMAN 3 Jember. Unlike previous research, which primarily explores learning styles and metacognitive awareness separately, this study investigates their combined impact on student learning outcomes. A more comprehensive comparison with prior studies is provided to emphasize the findings' academic contribution and contextual significance. The sample consisted of 72 students from classes XI-1 and XI-2, analyzed using ANACOVA in SPSS 26. The results showed that learning styles, especially kinesthetic learners, significantly affect metacognitive awareness (p = 0.007). However, learning styles did not significantly affect cognitive learning outcomes (p = 0.104) or psychomotor learning outcomes (p = 0.312). One-way ANOVA test significantly affected affective learning outcomes (p = 0.039), especially in visual learners. This study collected data through standard learning style assessments, metacognitive awareness inventories, and biology learning outcome tests. Findings emphasize the role of learning styles in improving metacognitive awareness and affective learning in the RQAAD model, underscoring the importance of personalized teaching strategies to optimize student learning experiences. Keywords: Biology learning outcomes; Learning styles; Metacognitive awareness; RQAAD learning model

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vidya Karya
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20527/jvk.v40i1.21926
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning Styles’ Role in Enhancing Metacognition and Biology Achievement Using RQAAD

Bea Hana Siswati, Suratno Suratno, Alina Sawitri, Avril Ley Ann R. Llave
Vidya Karya
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

Learning Styles’ Role in Enhancing Metacognition and Biology Achievement Using RQAAD

Bea Hana Siswati, Suratno Suratno, Alina Sawitri, Avril Ley Ann R. Llave
article en

Abstract

Modern education requires students to develop high metacognitive awareness for effective learning management, which supports applying the RQAAD model based on learning styles. This study investigates the effect of learning styles on metacognitive awareness and biology learning outcomes using a quasi-experimental method with a pre-test-post-test design at SMAN 3 Jember. Unlike previous research, which primarily explores learning styles and metacognitive awareness separately, this study investigates their combined impact on student learning outcomes. A more comprehensive comparison with prior studies is provided to emphasize the findings' academic contribution and contextual significance. The sample consisted of 72 students from classes XI-1 and XI-2, analyzed using ANACOVA in SPSS 26. The results showed that learning styles, especially kinesthetic learners, significantly affect metacognitive awareness (p = 0.007). However, learning styles did not significantly affect cognitive learning outcomes (p = 0.104) or psychomotor learning outcomes (p = 0.312). One-way ANOVA test significantly affected affective learning outcomes (p = 0.039), especially in visual learners. This study collected data through standard learning style assessments, metacognitive awareness inventories, and biology learning outcome tests. Findings emphasize the role of learning styles in improving metacognitive awareness and affective learning in the RQAAD model, underscoring the importance of personalized teaching strategies to optimize student learning experiences. Keywords: Biology learning outcomes; Learning styles; Metacognitive awareness; RQAAD learning model

Vidya KaryaVol. 40(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.