Whose Pain Is It, Anyway?: On Kippie Moeketsi and John Chavafambira’s Encounter with Medical Science

Black pain, while overwhelmingly real for those experiencing it, has an altogether incontestably singular structure that exposes the incompatibility of protocols of relief with the structure of anti-Blackness. Reading and reflecting on the late South African composer Kippie Moeketsi’s tragic sojourn in London’s Ferreira Hospital’s “mental asylum,” this paper probes, through an afropessimist critique, the tension between the unfettered access to and gratuitous enjoyment of the (pained) Black body and problem of Black thought. Instead of treating this incident as isolated, I trace it from Wulf Sachs’ psychoanalytic-cum-anthropological study of and relationship with a Black analysand, John Chavafambira, in his 1937 Black Hamlet (later adapted to Black Anger in a revised 1947 edition) to highlight a fundamental ambivalence and dependence of human social relations on Black pain for their coherence. Moreover, I interrogate the problem of the figure of the “mad African” and the supposed incongruity of their psychic structure with the demands of an anti-Black order.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/topia-2023-0060
Primary Topic
History of Science and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose Pain Is It, Anyway?: On Kippie Moeketsi and John Chavafambira’s Encounter with Medical Science

Vusumzi Nkomo
TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies
History of Science and Medicine
article

Whose Pain Is It, Anyway?: On Kippie Moeketsi and John Chavafambira’s Encounter with Medical Science

Vusumzi Nkomo
article en

Abstract

Black pain, while overwhelmingly real for those experiencing it, has an altogether incontestably singular structure that exposes the incompatibility of protocols of relief with the structure of anti-Blackness. Reading and reflecting on the late South African composer Kippie Moeketsi’s tragic sojourn in London’s Ferreira Hospital’s “mental asylum,” this paper probes, through an afropessimist critique, the tension between the unfettered access to and gratuitous enjoyment of the (pained) Black body and problem of Black thought. Instead of treating this incident as isolated, I trace it from Wulf Sachs’ psychoanalytic-cum-anthropological study of and relationship with a Black analysand, John Chavafambira, in his 1937 Black Hamlet (later adapted to Black Anger in a revised 1947 edition) to highlight a fundamental ambivalence and dependence of human social relations on Black pain for their coherence. Moreover, I interrogate the problem of the figure of the “mad African” and the supposed incongruity of their psychic structure with the demands of an anti-Black order.

TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural StudiesVol. 49
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
History of Science and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Whose Pain Is It, Anyway?: On Kippie Moeketsi and John Chavafambira’s Encounter with Medical Science — Vusumzi Nkomo · TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS