Unveiling Cognitive Biases in Software Testing: Insights from a Survey and Controlled Experiment

Biases are hard-wired behaviours that influence software testers. Understanding how these biases affect testers' everyday behaviour is crucial for developing practical software tools and strategies to help testers avoid the pitfalls of cognitive biases. This research aims to assess the extent to which software testers know the influence of cognitive biases on their work. Our study was conducted in two incremental steps: a survey and a controlled experiment. Firstly, we developed a questionnaire survey designed to reveal the extent of software testers' knowledge about cognitive biases and their awareness of these biases' influence on testing. We contacted software professionals in different environments and gathered valid data from 60 practitioners. The survey results suggest that software professionals are aware of biases, specifically preconceptions such as confirmation bias, fixation, and convenience. Additionally, biases like optimism, ownership, and blissful ignorance were commonly recognized. In line with other research, we observed that software professionals tend to identify more cognitive biases in others than in their judgments and actions, indicating a vulnerability to bias blind spot. To build on these findings, we performed a controlled experiment with 12 participants to investigate the behaviour and biases exhibited by humans when attempting to solve a hypothetical test problem. Through thematic analysis, we identified prevalent biases such as confirmation bias, pattern recognition and overreliance, sunk cost fallacy, and anchoring bias among participants. Additionally, we found that collaborative problem-solving was a prominent feature, often leading to biases like groupthink.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/apsec65559.2024.00053
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling Cognitive Biases in Software Testing: Insights from a Survey and Controlled Experiment

Eduard Paul Enoiu, Jean Malm, Alexandru Cusmaru
2 citations
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
0.98
article

Unveiling Cognitive Biases in Software Testing: Insights from a Survey and Controlled Experiment

Eduard Paul Enoiu, Jean Malm, Alexandru Cusmaru
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Biases are hard-wired behaviours that influence software testers. Understanding how these biases affect testers' everyday behaviour is crucial for developing practical software tools and strategies to help testers avoid the pitfalls of cognitive biases. This research aims to assess the extent to which software testers know the influence of cognitive biases on their work. Our study was conducted in two incremental steps: a survey and a controlled experiment. Firstly, we developed a questionnaire survey designed to reveal the extent of software testers' knowledge about cognitive biases and their awareness of these biases' influence on testing. We contacted software professionals in different environments and gathered valid data from 60 practitioners. The survey results suggest that software professionals are aware of biases, specifically preconceptions such as confirmation bias, fixation, and convenience. Additionally, biases like optimism, ownership, and blissful ignorance were commonly recognized. In line with other research, we observed that software professionals tend to identify more cognitive biases in others than in their judgments and actions, indicating a vulnerability to bias blind spot. To build on these findings, we performed a controlled experiment with 12 participants to investigate the behaviour and biases exhibited by humans when attempting to solve a hypothetical test problem. Through thematic analysis, we identified prevalent biases such as confirmation bias, pattern recognition and overreliance, sunk cost fallacy, and anchoring bias among participants. Additionally, we found that collaborative problem-solving was a prominent feature, often leading to biases like groupthink.

Siemens (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.