Lessons in Cooperation: Driver Sentiments Toward Real-Time Advisory Systems

Real-time advisory systems (RTASs) are a crucial milestone on the road toward fully autonomous driving. Current proof-of-concept RTASs, which observe drivers and their environment to provide advice, are effective in addressing fundamental traffic issues (e.g., congestion mitigation). However, interactions between these advisors and drivers have not yet been studied. In this article, we present insights from the first user study to explore drivers’ interactions with these progressive systems. We query the reactions of 16 drivers to congestion mitigation advisors (CMAs) in a driving simulator. We discuss drivers’ sentiments toward CMAs exhibiting diverse behaviors and their preferences for various aspects of the interactions such as the advice provided and the user interface. The effects of the behaviors on driver trust and adaption are also explored. We present recommendations to inform the design of cooperative advisory systems that will be ubiquitous as vehicle technology moves toward full automation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mits.2025.3555564
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons in Cooperation: Driver Sentiments Toward Real-Time Advisory Systems

Aamir Hasan, Haonan Chen, Katherine Driggs-Campbell, Neeloy Chakraborty et al.
IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Lessons in Cooperation: Driver Sentiments Toward Real-Time Advisory Systems

Aamir Hasan, Haonan Chen, Katherine Driggs-Campbell, Neeloy Chakraborty, Cathy Wu
article en

Abstract

Real-time advisory systems (RTASs) are a crucial milestone on the road toward fully autonomous driving. Current proof-of-concept RTASs, which observe drivers and their environment to provide advice, are effective in addressing fundamental traffic issues (e.g., congestion mitigation). However, interactions between these advisors and drivers have not yet been studied. In this article, we present insights from the first user study to explore drivers’ interactions with these progressive systems. We query the reactions of 16 drivers to congestion mitigation advisors (CMAs) in a driving simulator. We discuss drivers’ sentiments toward CMAs exhibiting diverse behaviors and their preferences for various aspects of the interactions such as the advice provided and the user interface. The effects of the behaviors on driver trust and adaption are also explored. We present recommendations to inform the design of cooperative advisory systems that will be ubiquitous as vehicle technology moves toward full automation.

IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems MagazineVol. 17(5)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Menlo School (US), Decision Systems (United States) (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.