Comparison of SVM and Random Forest for Multimodal Hand Gesture Recognition

Machine learning has been implemented to detect and identify sign language hand gestures (letters and numbers) using the Photoplethysmography (PPG) and impedance. The sensor data was collected from commercially available wristbands and evaluation boards. Two supervised machine learning algorithms: Random Forest and Support Vector Machine were used for categorizing the data points. The accuracy for each of the algorithms for the letters and numbers was within the range of either 70-75% or 20-28% for the PPG data. The accuracy was between 33-40% and 55-66% using Random Forest. The accuracy was between 61-76% to 80-90% for when using Support Vector Machine for impedance data. Between the two algorithms, the Random forest approach has better consistency of 70-75% with PPG data whereas the Support Vector Machine approach is more consistent for impedance data with 61-76% accuracy to detect the hand gestures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/southeastcon56624.2025.10971446
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of SVM and Random Forest for Multimodal Hand Gesture Recognition

Nicole McFarlane, Farin Rahman, Joshua Samuel
1 citations
Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
1.94
article

Comparison of SVM and Random Forest for Multimodal Hand Gesture Recognition

Nicole McFarlane, Farin Rahman, Joshua Samuel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Machine learning has been implemented to detect and identify sign language hand gestures (letters and numbers) using the Photoplethysmography (PPG) and impedance. The sensor data was collected from commercially available wristbands and evaluation boards. Two supervised machine learning algorithms: Random Forest and Support Vector Machine were used for categorizing the data points. The accuracy for each of the algorithms for the letters and numbers was within the range of either 70-75% or 20-28% for the PPG data. The accuracy was between 33-40% and 55-66% using Random Forest. The accuracy was between 61-76% to 80-90% for when using Support Vector Machine for impedance data. Between the two algorithms, the Random forest approach has better consistency of 70-75% with PPG data whereas the Support Vector Machine approach is more consistent for impedance data with 61-76% accuracy to detect the hand gestures.

Rochester Institute of Technology (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
1.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.