A Multi-Agent LLM Environment for Software Design and Refactoring: A Conceptual Framework

Modern software systems demand continuous evolution to maintain performance, scalability, and security. Traditional single-agent AI-driven code refactoring approaches are often limited in addressing the multi-faceted constraints (e.g., performance, security, maintainability) that emerge during complex software design tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel Multi-Agent Large Language Model (LLM) Environment for automated software design and refactoring. Our conceptual framework comprises specialized LLM “experts,” each trained or fine-tuned on a different aspect of software engineering (performance optimization, security hardening, UI/UX, maintainability). These agents collaborate in a cooperative or competitive fashion-using coordination protocols akin to consensus or auction mechanisms-to synthesize design insights and refactoring recommendations. We present formal definitions of agent interactions (including mathematical notation for termination conditions), a sequence diagram demonstrating agent collaboration, a complexity analysis of the coordination mechanism, and an expanded reference list. Preliminary experimental design is outlined to demonstrate how multi-agent interactions may resolve conflicting design goals more effectively than a single-agent approach. Our aim is to provide a roadmap for integrating multi-agent LLMs into the software development lifecycle, thereby improving development efficiency, reducing technical debt, and enhancing software quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/southeastcon56624.2025.10971563
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi-Agent LLM Environment for Software Design and Refactoring: A Conceptual Framework

Shekhar Patil, V.U.B. Challagulla, V R Rajendran, Dinesh Besiahgari et al.
1 citations
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
2.28
article

A Multi-Agent LLM Environment for Software Design and Refactoring: A Conceptual Framework

Shekhar Patil, V.U.B. Challagulla, V R Rajendran, Dinesh Besiahgari, Manjunath Chandrashekaraiah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Modern software systems demand continuous evolution to maintain performance, scalability, and security. Traditional single-agent AI-driven code refactoring approaches are often limited in addressing the multi-faceted constraints (e.g., performance, security, maintainability) that emerge during complex software design tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel Multi-Agent Large Language Model (LLM) Environment for automated software design and refactoring. Our conceptual framework comprises specialized LLM “experts,” each trained or fine-tuned on a different aspect of software engineering (performance optimization, security hardening, UI/UX, maintainability). These agents collaborate in a cooperative or competitive fashion-using coordination protocols akin to consensus or auction mechanisms-to synthesize design insights and refactoring recommendations. We present formal definitions of agent interactions (including mathematical notation for termination conditions), a sequence diagram demonstrating agent collaboration, a complexity analysis of the coordination mechanism, and an expanded reference list. Preliminary experimental design is outlined to demonstrate how multi-agent interactions may resolve conflicting design goals more effectively than a single-agent approach. Our aim is to provide a roadmap for integrating multi-agent LLMs into the software development lifecycle, thereby improving development efficiency, reducing technical debt, and enhancing software quality.

Amazon (United States) (US), West Chester University (US), Seattle University (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
2.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.