LLMorpheus: Mutation Testing Using Large Language Models
In mutation testing, the quality of a test suite is evaluated by introducing faults into a program and determining whether the program’s tests detect them. Most existing approaches for mutation testing involve the application of a fixed set of mutation operators, e.g., replacing a “+” with a “-”, or removing a function’s body. However, certain types of real-world bugs cannot easily be simulated by such approaches, limiting their effectiveness. This paper presents a technique for mutation testing where placeholders are introduced at designated locations in a program’s source code and where a Large Language Model (LLM) is prompted to ask what they could be replaced with. The technique is implemented in <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">LLMorpheus</i>, a mutation testing tool for JavaScript, and evaluated on 13 subject packages, considering several variations on the prompting strategy, and using several LLMs. We find <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">LLMorpheus</i> to be capable of producing mutants that resemble existing bugs that cannot be produced by <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">StrykerJS</i>, a state-of-the-art mutation testing tool. Moreover, we report on the running time, cost, and number of mutants produced by <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">LLMorpheus</i>, demonstrating its practicality.
Authors
- Jonathan Bell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1187-9298)
- Frank Tip (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1862-3498)
- Max Schäfer
Institutions
- Northeastern University (US)
- Visuray (Malta) (MT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 2025-04-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2025.3562025
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Topic Modeling
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 12.40