Empirical Evaluation of Public HateSpeech Datasets

Despite the extensive communication benefits offered by social media platforms, numerous challenges must be addressed to ensure user safety. One of the most significant risks faced by users on these platforms is targeted hatespeech. Social media platforms are widely utilized for generating datasets employed in training and evaluating machine learning algorithms for hatespeech detection. However, existing public datasets exhibit numerous limitations, hindering the effective training of these algorithms and leading to inaccurate hatespeech classification. This study provides a systematic empirical evaluation of several public datasets commonly used in automated hatespeech classification. Through rigorous analysis, we present compelling evidence highlighting the limitations of current hatespeech datasets. Additionally, we conduct a range of statistical analyses to elucidate the strengths and weaknesses inherent in these datasets. This work aims to advance the development of more accurate and reliable machine learning models for hatespeech detection by addressing the dataset limitations identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.2025.3564605
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Evaluation of Public HateSpeech Datasets

Basel Barakat, Sardar Jaf
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Empirical Evaluation of Public HateSpeech Datasets

Basel Barakat, Sardar Jaf
article en

Abstract

Despite the extensive communication benefits offered by social media platforms, numerous challenges must be addressed to ensure user safety. One of the most significant risks faced by users on these platforms is targeted hatespeech. Social media platforms are widely utilized for generating datasets employed in training and evaluating machine learning algorithms for hatespeech detection. However, existing public datasets exhibit numerous limitations, hindering the effective training of these algorithms and leading to inaccurate hatespeech classification. This study provides a systematic empirical evaluation of several public datasets commonly used in automated hatespeech classification. Through rigorous analysis, we present compelling evidence highlighting the limitations of current hatespeech datasets. Additionally, we conduct a range of statistical analyses to elucidate the strengths and weaknesses inherent in these datasets. This work aims to advance the development of more accurate and reliable machine learning models for hatespeech detection by addressing the dataset limitations identified.

IEEE Transactions on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 6(11)
University of Sunderland (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.