Optimal spectroscopic measurement design: Bayesian framework for rational data acquisition

Abstract We propose an optimal experimental design method for spectroscopic measurements that can determine the appropriate number and placement of measurement points in a rational manner. Spectroscopic measurements are fundamental for material characterization. It is essential to determine the optimal experimental conditions in an automated, mathematically guaranteed manner for rational and autonomous experiments; however, these conditions have traditionally been determined on the basis of the intuition of human experts. In this work, we developed a method for extracting prior information from a standard spectral database and incorporating it into the Bayesian experimental design framework to determine the optimal measurement points automatically. We verified the proposed method by applying it to x-ray absorption spectrum measurements and evaluated its optimality through conventional analysis. We found that only 70% of the measurement points used in previous studies were sufficient and that the obtained points are consistent with the experts’ intuition. The proposed method is expected to enable more rational and efficient fully automated experiments in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/add0f6
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal spectroscopic measurement design: Bayesian framework for rational data acquisition

Hideitsu Hino, Yasuo Takeichi, Kanta Ono, Yusei Ito
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
article

Optimal spectroscopic measurement design: Bayesian framework for rational data acquisition

Hideitsu Hino, Yasuo Takeichi, Kanta Ono, Yusei Ito
article en

Abstract

Abstract We propose an optimal experimental design method for spectroscopic measurements that can determine the appropriate number and placement of measurement points in a rational manner. Spectroscopic measurements are fundamental for material characterization. It is essential to determine the optimal experimental conditions in an automated, mathematically guaranteed manner for rational and autonomous experiments; however, these conditions have traditionally been determined on the basis of the intuition of human experts. In this work, we developed a method for extracting prior information from a standard spectral database and incorporating it into the Bayesian experimental design framework to determine the optimal measurement points automatically. We verified the proposed method by applying it to x-ray absorption spectrum measurements and evaluated its optimality through conventional analysis. We found that only 70% of the measurement points used in previous studies were sufficient and that the obtained points are consistent with the experts’ intuition. The proposed method is expected to enable more rational and efficient fully automated experiments in the future.

Machine Learning Science and TechnologyVol. 6(2)
The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, JST-Mirai Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimal spectroscopic measurement design: Bayesian framework for rational data acquisition — Hideitsu Hino, Yasuo Takeichi, et al. · Machine Learning Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS