Effects of analogy and explicit instructional strategies on affective responses during lifting tasks among novice exercisers

Abstract The instruction given before a lifting task could modulate the affective responses of the participants in a training program. This study aimed to analyze the effects of two types of instruction—analogy and explicit—on the affective responses of novice exercisers during lifting tasks. Twenty-one subjects participated in the present study. A crossover design was employed, in which all participants experienced both instructional conditions in a randomized within-subjects approach. Instruction was provided before performing each lifting task. On day 1, familiarization was done about questionnaires and tasks. On days 2 and 3, participants performed the lifting tasks under their assigned instructional condition, with counterbalanced order. Affective responses such as preferences, self-efficacy, and feeling scale were assessed after the lifting task. Participants equally preferred analogy and explicit instruction. Nonetheless, in those participants who preferred analogy instruction, the force applied was reduced. Self-efficacy improved with both instructions ( p < 0.001), while the feeling scale showed no significant effects ( p = 0.157). In conclusion, both instructions enhanced self-efficacy, but only analogy instruction reduced force production. Providing instruction during exercise enhances the overall experience, particularly for novice participants, by offering guidance and increasing confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sport Sciences for Health
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-025-01393-y
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of analogy and explicit instructional strategies on affective responses during lifting tasks among novice exercisers

Ángel Carnero-Díaz, Javier Pecci, Adriana Kaplánová
Sport Sciences for Health
Sports Performance and Training
article

Effects of analogy and explicit instructional strategies on affective responses during lifting tasks among novice exercisers

Ángel Carnero-Díaz, Javier Pecci, Adriana Kaplánová
article en

Abstract

Abstract The instruction given before a lifting task could modulate the affective responses of the participants in a training program. This study aimed to analyze the effects of two types of instruction—analogy and explicit—on the affective responses of novice exercisers during lifting tasks. Twenty-one subjects participated in the present study. A crossover design was employed, in which all participants experienced both instructional conditions in a randomized within-subjects approach. Instruction was provided before performing each lifting task. On day 1, familiarization was done about questionnaires and tasks. On days 2 and 3, participants performed the lifting tasks under their assigned instructional condition, with counterbalanced order. Affective responses such as preferences, self-efficacy, and feeling scale were assessed after the lifting task. Participants equally preferred analogy and explicit instruction. Nonetheless, in those participants who preferred analogy instruction, the force applied was reduced. Self-efficacy improved with both instructions ( p < 0.001), while the feeling scale showed no significant effects ( p = 0.157). In conclusion, both instructions enhanced self-efficacy, but only analogy instruction reduced force production. Providing instruction during exercise enhances the overall experience, particularly for novice participants, by offering guidance and increasing confidence.

Sport Sciences for HealthVol. 21(3)
Comenius University Bratislava (SK), Universidad de Sevilla (ES), Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.