Problematika Penerapan Pasal 28 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik

This study aims to identify Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law No. 19 of 2016 on the Amendment to Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) regulates the dissemination of information that potentially threatens freedom of expression. However, the application of this article has caused several problems that contradict the principle of legality, especially in the context of lex certa (a legal principle that requires the formulation of a crime to be clear). The phrase “causing hatred or hostility” in Section 28 Clause (2) of the ITE Law has a very broad and unspecific scope, allowing for different interpretations. This can lead to abuse and unfair prosecution of individuals who unintentionally spread information that is considered provocative. The provisions of Section 28 Clause (2) of the ITE Law do not have a further explanation of hatred, thus allowing for different understandings that lead to multiple interpretations in legal practice and in the context of Lex Certa, the application of Article 28 Paragraph (2) of the ITE Law must meet definite and clear legal requirements. The need for revision of Section 28 Clause (2) of the ITE Law to avoid multiple interpretations that have the potential for criminalization based on articles whose formulations are vague or unclear.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Hukum Legalita
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47637/legalita.v6i2.1413
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problematika Penerapan Pasal 28 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik

Christovel Yamado Yacob
Jurnal Hukum Legalita
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Problematika Penerapan Pasal 28 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik

Christovel Yamado Yacob
article en

Abstract

This study aims to identify Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law No. 19 of 2016 on the Amendment to Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) regulates the dissemination of information that potentially threatens freedom of expression. However, the application of this article has caused several problems that contradict the principle of legality, especially in the context of lex certa (a legal principle that requires the formulation of a crime to be clear). The phrase “causing hatred or hostility” in Section 28 Clause (2) of the ITE Law has a very broad and unspecific scope, allowing for different interpretations. This can lead to abuse and unfair prosecution of individuals who unintentionally spread information that is considered provocative. The provisions of Section 28 Clause (2) of the ITE Law do not have a further explanation of hatred, thus allowing for different understandings that lead to multiple interpretations in legal practice and in the context of Lex Certa, the application of Article 28 Paragraph (2) of the ITE Law must meet definite and clear legal requirements. The need for revision of Section 28 Clause (2) of the ITE Law to avoid multiple interpretations that have the potential for criminalization based on articles whose formulations are vague or unclear.

Jurnal Hukum LegalitaVol. 6(2)
Satya Wacana Christian University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.