Interference Effect of Geocell-Reinforced Shallow Strip Foundations on Sandy Soil

This paper discusses the results of laboratory model tests on interfering shallow strip foundations, investigating both unreinforced and geocell-reinforced configurations. The tests cover a spectrum of spacing ratios, defined as the ratio of the center-to-center distance between two foundations to the width of the strip foundation, ranging from 1 to 5 under varying relative densities of sandy soil. The results revealed that, depending on both the relative density and the spacing ratio, the ultimate bearing capacity increased significantly, ranging from 4.8 to 8.4 times with the introduction of geocell reinforcement and the interference effect of strip foundations compared with that of unreinforced single foundation. The optimum spacing ratio for achieving the maximum ultimate bearing capacity was 1.5 for both unreinforced loose and dense sand, as well as for geocell-reinforced dense sand. However, this ratio was 2 for geocell-reinforced loose sand. The interference effect nearly disappeared at a spacing ratio of 5 for both unreinforced and geocell-reinforced conditions. Furthermore, the extent of the settlement patterns on the ground surface was most pronounced for both geocell-reinforced loose and dense sands at the optimum spacing ratio.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-18828
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interference Effect of Geocell-Reinforced Shallow Strip Foundations on Sandy Soil

Sarper Demirdöğen, Ayhan Gürbüz, Kaan Yünkül, Ferhat Karatas
1 citations
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
article

Interference Effect of Geocell-Reinforced Shallow Strip Foundations on Sandy Soil

Sarper Demirdöğen, Ayhan Gürbüz, Kaan Yünkül, Ferhat Karatas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses the results of laboratory model tests on interfering shallow strip foundations, investigating both unreinforced and geocell-reinforced configurations. The tests cover a spectrum of spacing ratios, defined as the ratio of the center-to-center distance between two foundations to the width of the strip foundation, ranging from 1 to 5 under varying relative densities of sandy soil. The results revealed that, depending on both the relative density and the spacing ratio, the ultimate bearing capacity increased significantly, ranging from 4.8 to 8.4 times with the introduction of geocell reinforcement and the interference effect of strip foundations compared with that of unreinforced single foundation. The optimum spacing ratio for achieving the maximum ultimate bearing capacity was 1.5 for both unreinforced loose and dense sand, as well as for geocell-reinforced dense sand. However, this ratio was 2 for geocell-reinforced loose sand. The interference effect nearly disappeared at a spacing ratio of 5 for both unreinforced and geocell-reinforced conditions. Furthermore, the extent of the settlement patterns on the ground surface was most pronounced for both geocell-reinforced loose and dense sands at the optimum spacing ratio.

Journal of Materials in Civil EngineeringVol. 37(7)
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR), Gazi Hastanesi (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.