Genome-wide donor–recipient non-HLA mismatch and graft loss

HLA-matching between donor (D) and recipient (R) is routinely performed in kidney allocation to optimize allograft survival but explains only a moderate variability of these outcomes. Recent findings suggest that donor-to-recipient mismatches outside the HLA region contribute to alloimmunity and graft loss, but the extent varies in different publications. We therefore conducted a systematic review of publications on this subject using a broad search string in our literature review in accordance with current guidelines for systematic reviews. The effect sizes were analyzed by a meta-analysis. A total of 1890 publications from 2019-25 within three different repositories (465 Medline, 1408 Embase, 17 Central) were systematically screened using the PICOTS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Time and Setting) system, which resulted in 12 eligible papers that met the inclusion criteria. Cohort studies that investigated the association of D-R non-HLA SNP mismatch and graft rejection/loss in renal transplant patients were included. We found that overall SNP mismatch between D-R pairs outside the HLA region was independently numerically associated with rejection hazard ratio (HR) 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.65] and graft loss HR 1.35 (95% CI 0.86-2.12). Furthermore, loss of function mutation of the gene LIMS1 in the recipient who received a transplant organ with at least one functioning copy (collision genotype) was numerically associated with rejection HR 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.23) and graft loss HR 1.43 (95% CI 0.61-3.36). The exact quantification of the effect size of these mismatches varied by publication and needs further investigation. Based on these data, the strength of immunosuppression may be guided by the load of D-R mismatches in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf073
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genome-wide donor–recipient non-HLA mismatch and graft loss

Alexander Kainz, Stephen Shoebridge, Andreas Heinzel, Rainer Oberbauer et al.
1 citations
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
1.99
article

Genome-wide donor–recipient non-HLA mismatch and graft loss

Alexander Kainz, Stephen Shoebridge, Andreas Heinzel, Rainer Oberbauer, Julia M. A. Pickl
article en
1 citations

Abstract

HLA-matching between donor (D) and recipient (R) is routinely performed in kidney allocation to optimize allograft survival but explains only a moderate variability of these outcomes. Recent findings suggest that donor-to-recipient mismatches outside the HLA region contribute to alloimmunity and graft loss, but the extent varies in different publications. We therefore conducted a systematic review of publications on this subject using a broad search string in our literature review in accordance with current guidelines for systematic reviews. The effect sizes were analyzed by a meta-analysis. A total of 1890 publications from 2019-25 within three different repositories (465 Medline, 1408 Embase, 17 Central) were systematically screened using the PICOTS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Time and Setting) system, which resulted in 12 eligible papers that met the inclusion criteria. Cohort studies that investigated the association of D-R non-HLA SNP mismatch and graft rejection/loss in renal transplant patients were included. We found that overall SNP mismatch between D-R pairs outside the HLA region was independently numerically associated with rejection hazard ratio (HR) 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.65] and graft loss HR 1.35 (95% CI 0.86-2.12). Furthermore, loss of function mutation of the gene LIMS1 in the recipient who received a transplant organ with at least one functioning copy (collision genotype) was numerically associated with rejection HR 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.23) and graft loss HR 1.43 (95% CI 0.61-3.36). The exact quantification of the effect size of these mismatches varied by publication and needs further investigation. Based on these data, the strength of immunosuppression may be guided by the load of D-R mismatches in the future.

Nephrology Dialysis TransplantationVol. 41(1)
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Vienna Science and Technology Fund
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
1.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.