Perspectivas arqueológicas e genealógicas para uma epistemologia política do desenvolvimento

Thinking about development from an archaeological and genealogical perspective was exercised in this article. The aim is to support the understanding of scientific work based on the analysis of the meanings acquired by the term over time, always linked to a dynamic movement that starts from a certain point and arrives at another, often considered superior. Considering these uses, it was questioned that from the eminently evolutionary bias, sometimes ideological and violent, it was considered that this mode of reflection can deny fundamentals of scientific thought, relevant, such as the historical perspective. Therefore, the meanings of philosophical thinking and their relationship with considerations about development were questioned and contributions on Nietzsche's genealogy, archeology and genealogy of Foucault were used. Finally, approaches were listed to support epistemological reflections on the understanding of development as a science. Key words: epistemology; development; philosophy; genealogy; archeology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Profanações
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24302/prof.v12.5913
Primary Topic
Development, Ethics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectivas arqueológicas e genealógicas para uma epistemologia política do desenvolvimento

Cíntia Neves Godoi, Sandro Luíz Bazzanella
Profanações
Development, Ethics, and Society
article

Perspectivas arqueológicas e genealógicas para uma epistemologia política do desenvolvimento

Cíntia Neves Godoi, Sandro Luíz Bazzanella
article en

Abstract

Thinking about development from an archaeological and genealogical perspective was exercised in this article. The aim is to support the understanding of scientific work based on the analysis of the meanings acquired by the term over time, always linked to a dynamic movement that starts from a certain point and arrives at another, often considered superior. Considering these uses, it was questioned that from the eminently evolutionary bias, sometimes ideological and violent, it was considered that this mode of reflection can deny fundamentals of scientific thought, relevant, such as the historical perspective. Therefore, the meanings of philosophical thinking and their relationship with considerations about development were questioned and contributions on Nietzsche's genealogy, archeology and genealogy of Foucault were used. Finally, approaches were listed to support epistemological reflections on the understanding of development as a science. Key words: epistemology; development; philosophy; genealogy; archeology.

ProfanaçõesVol. 12
Universidade do Contestado (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Development, Ethics, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.