Premedication Strategies in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) Utilizing Either Intramuscular Midazolam or Midazolam/Butorphanol Compared to Saline Control

Avian anesthesia in translational medicine must account for various species, yet there is limited research specifically on turkeys used in scientific studies. Premedication is commonly used in veterinary medicine to produce smoother anesthetic events for patients and staff. This study assessed premedication of turkeys using intramuscular midazolam (MDZ) or midazolam/butorphanol (MDZ-B) compared with saline control to improve handling/patient behaviors. Female turkeys ( n = 35) undergoing a surgical procedure for an orthopedic study were randomly divided into 3 groups (midazolam: 2 mg/kg IM; midazolam: 2 mg/kg IM and butorphanol: 1 mg/kg IM; or saline control: 0.45 mL/kg). Blinded raters qualitatively scored perianesthetic criteria at approximately 10 min post premedication (body position, restraint required, and muscle relaxation), following induction (intubation attempts/ease and apnea), and at recovery (restraint required, tremors, and wing flapping). Relevant time points tracked quantitative data including time of premedication, induction, intubation, inhalant anesthesia end time, and recovery. Premedication with either MDZ or MDZ-B improved perianesthetic parameters such as achieving sternal recumbency, lessening the restraint required, and improving muscle relaxation when compared with saline control. Use of MDZ or MDZ-B significantly decreased the time from premedication to intubation compared with control. The saline control group had significantly faster recoveries than the premedication groups. Choosing an appropriate anesthetic premedication protocol involves considering many factors. Turkeys premedicated with either MDZ or MDZ-B had easier induction leading to improved animal handling and restraint by staff. Due to significantly longer recovery times, MDZ or MDZ-B may increase the periprocedural labor required yet offer a smoother, less traumatic recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30802/aalas-jaalas-24-129
Primary Topic
Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Premedication Strategies in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) Utilizing Either Intramuscular Midazolam or Midazolam/Butorphanol Compared to Saline Control

Robert Rose, Loni A Taylor, Tracy H Vemulapalli, Jonathan Bova et al.
Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
Pharmacological Effects and Assays
article

Premedication Strategies in Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) Utilizing Either Intramuscular Midazolam or Midazolam/Butorphanol Compared to Saline Control

Robert Rose, Loni A Taylor, Tracy H Vemulapalli, Jonathan Bova, Ryan P Buhrer
article en

Abstract

Avian anesthesia in translational medicine must account for various species, yet there is limited research specifically on turkeys used in scientific studies. Premedication is commonly used in veterinary medicine to produce smoother anesthetic events for patients and staff. This study assessed premedication of turkeys using intramuscular midazolam (MDZ) or midazolam/butorphanol (MDZ-B) compared with saline control to improve handling/patient behaviors. Female turkeys ( n = 35) undergoing a surgical procedure for an orthopedic study were randomly divided into 3 groups (midazolam: 2 mg/kg IM; midazolam: 2 mg/kg IM and butorphanol: 1 mg/kg IM; or saline control: 0.45 mL/kg). Blinded raters qualitatively scored perianesthetic criteria at approximately 10 min post premedication (body position, restraint required, and muscle relaxation), following induction (intubation attempts/ease and apnea), and at recovery (restraint required, tremors, and wing flapping). Relevant time points tracked quantitative data including time of premedication, induction, intubation, inhalant anesthesia end time, and recovery. Premedication with either MDZ or MDZ-B improved perianesthetic parameters such as achieving sternal recumbency, lessening the restraint required, and improving muscle relaxation when compared with saline control. Use of MDZ or MDZ-B significantly decreased the time from premedication to intubation compared with control. The saline control group had significantly faster recoveries than the premedication groups. Choosing an appropriate anesthetic premedication protocol involves considering many factors. Turkeys premedicated with either MDZ or MDZ-B had easier induction leading to improved animal handling and restraint by staff. Due to significantly longer recovery times, MDZ or MDZ-B may increase the periprocedural labor required yet offer a smoother, less traumatic recovery.

Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal ScienceVol. 64(3)
Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Pharmacological Effects and Assays
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.