Equal image quality and reduced radiation exposure in whole-spine X-ray imaging with slot-scanning technique compared with stitched radiography

Repeated whole-spine imaging in children and adolescents with scoliosis causes significant cumulative radiation exposure. Low-dose slot-scanning imaging can reduce radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to compare whole-spine imaging using the slot-scanning technique (SST) with conventional stitched radiography (SR) with regard to image quality and radiation dose.We recruited 30 patients with a clinical indication for whole-spine imaging by SST, who had prior whole-spine imaging by SR available. 41 images acquired using both techniques were analyzed. The dose area product (DAP) and patient age, weight, height, and body-mass index were recorded. Image quality was assessed for 28 anatomical landmarks on a 4-point Likert scale by 4 raters. Group-wise comparisons were performed using paired t-tests. Interrater rating reliability was assessed using the interrater correlation coefficient.The mean DAP was significantly lower for SST than for SR (SST 8.0 ± 5.7 cGy · cm², SR 32.5 ± 34.5 cGy · cm², p < 0.001). The image quality was rated good for both modalities (means: SST 2.8 ± 0.6, SR 2.7 ± 0.5, p = 0.38). There was no significant difference in image quality ratings between both modalities. The inter-rater reliability was excellent with an inter-rater correlation coefficient of 0.86. Orthopedic surgeons rated the image quality of SST significantly better than that of SR.This study shows a significant reduction in radiation exposure for slot-scanning whole-spine imaging compared to stitched radiography with equal image quality, which facilitates the reduction of radiation exposure for repeated whole-spine imaging in children and adolescents to 25%. · Image quality is comparable between slot-scanning and stitched whole-spine imaging.. · The slot-scanning technique had a significantly lower dose area product compared with stitched radiographs.. · Orthopedic surgeons rated the image quality of slot-scanning significantly better than that of stitching.. · Radiation exposure in scoliosis whole-spine imaging can be reduced to 25%.. · Liebscher H, Scherzer M, Meißner C et al. Equal image quality and reduced radiation exposure in whole-spine X-ray imaging with slot-scanning technique compared with stitched radiography. Rofo 2026; 198: 219-227.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2564-0580
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equal image quality and reduced radiation exposure in whole-spine X-ray imaging with slot-scanning technique compared with stitched radiography

Patricia Hahlbohm, Sophia F. U. Blum, Mechthild Scherzer, Christoph Meißner et al.
RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Equal image quality and reduced radiation exposure in whole-spine X-ray imaging with slot-scanning technique compared with stitched radiography

Patricia Hahlbohm, Sophia F. U. Blum, Mechthild Scherzer, Christoph Meißner, Ralf‐Thorsten Hoffmann, Hendrik Liebscher, Stefan Zwingenberger, Jens‐Peter Kühn, Felix Schön, Uwe Platz
article en

Abstract

Repeated whole-spine imaging in children and adolescents with scoliosis causes significant cumulative radiation exposure. Low-dose slot-scanning imaging can reduce radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to compare whole-spine imaging using the slot-scanning technique (SST) with conventional stitched radiography (SR) with regard to image quality and radiation dose.We recruited 30 patients with a clinical indication for whole-spine imaging by SST, who had prior whole-spine imaging by SR available. 41 images acquired using both techniques were analyzed. The dose area product (DAP) and patient age, weight, height, and body-mass index were recorded. Image quality was assessed for 28 anatomical landmarks on a 4-point Likert scale by 4 raters. Group-wise comparisons were performed using paired t-tests. Interrater rating reliability was assessed using the interrater correlation coefficient.The mean DAP was significantly lower for SST than for SR (SST 8.0 ± 5.7 cGy · cm², SR 32.5 ± 34.5 cGy · cm², p < 0.001). The image quality was rated good for both modalities (means: SST 2.8 ± 0.6, SR 2.7 ± 0.5, p = 0.38). There was no significant difference in image quality ratings between both modalities. The inter-rater reliability was excellent with an inter-rater correlation coefficient of 0.86. Orthopedic surgeons rated the image quality of SST significantly better than that of SR.This study shows a significant reduction in radiation exposure for slot-scanning whole-spine imaging compared to stitched radiography with equal image quality, which facilitates the reduction of radiation exposure for repeated whole-spine imaging in children and adolescents to 25%. · Image quality is comparable between slot-scanning and stitched whole-spine imaging.. · The slot-scanning technique had a significantly lower dose area product compared with stitched radiographs.. · Orthopedic surgeons rated the image quality of slot-scanning significantly better than that of stitching.. · Radiation exposure in scoliosis whole-spine imaging can be reduced to 25%.. · Liebscher H, Scherzer M, Meißner C et al. Equal image quality and reduced radiation exposure in whole-spine X-ray imaging with slot-scanning technique compared with stitched radiography. Rofo 2026; 198: 219-227.

RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden VerfahrenVol. 198(02)
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Siemens Healthineers
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.