Imaging differences between enchondroma and atypical cartilaginous tumor: Insights from a reference center

Differentiating enchondromas from atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACTs) is crucial for optimal patient management, as ACTs often require surgical intervention or surveillance, whereas enchondromas are typically managed conservatively. This study aims to identify imaging markers that aid in distinguishing these entities through a comprehensive analysis of radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. This retrospective study included 50 patients diagnosed with ACT or enchondroma between 2013 and 2024. Imaging variables analyzed included tumor size, lobulation, matrix calcification, endosteal scalloping, periosteal reaction, cortical expansion, fat entrapment, T2-weighted hypersignal, heterogeneity, and cortical discontinuity. The distribution in short and long bones was also assessed. Statistical analysis used the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. Regarding final diagnosis, most patients had enchondromas (72 %, n = 36), followed by ACTs (20 %, n = 10) and chondrosarcomas (8 %, n = 4). ACTs showed a significant increase in tumor size and a preference for long bones (p < 0.05) compared to enchondromas. Endosteal scalloping demonstrated a strong trend toward significance (p = 0.051). Other radiologic characteristics had no significant difference. Tumor size and endosteal scalloping emerge as key markers in differentiating ACTs from enchondromas. However, the limited sample size and borderline statistical significance in some variables highlight the need for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorep.2025.100673
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imaging differences between enchondroma and atypical cartilaginous tumor: Insights from a reference center

Pedro Cardoso, Gonçalo Vieira da Silva, F. González Vargas, Pedro Neto et al.
1 citations
Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
1.67
article

Imaging differences between enchondroma and atypical cartilaginous tumor: Insights from a reference center

Pedro Cardoso, Gonçalo Vieira da Silva, F. González Vargas, Pedro Neto, João Nelas, Vânia C. C. Oliveira, Francisco Serra, Catarina Silva Souto, Manuel Carrapatoso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Differentiating enchondromas from atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACTs) is crucial for optimal patient management, as ACTs often require surgical intervention or surveillance, whereas enchondromas are typically managed conservatively. This study aims to identify imaging markers that aid in distinguishing these entities through a comprehensive analysis of radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. This retrospective study included 50 patients diagnosed with ACT or enchondroma between 2013 and 2024. Imaging variables analyzed included tumor size, lobulation, matrix calcification, endosteal scalloping, periosteal reaction, cortical expansion, fat entrapment, T2-weighted hypersignal, heterogeneity, and cortical discontinuity. The distribution in short and long bones was also assessed. Statistical analysis used the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. Regarding final diagnosis, most patients had enchondromas (72 %, n = 36), followed by ACTs (20 %, n = 10) and chondrosarcomas (8 %, n = 4). ACTs showed a significant increase in tumor size and a preference for long bones (p < 0.05) compared to enchondromas. Endosteal scalloping demonstrated a strong trend toward significance (p = 0.051). Other radiologic characteristics had no significant difference. Tumor size and endosteal scalloping emerge as key markers in differentiating ACTs from enchondromas. However, the limited sample size and borderline statistical significance in some variables highlight the need for further research.

Journal of Orthopaedic ReportsVol. 5(1)
Universidade do Porto (PT), Hospital de Santo António (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.