Practical Byzantine improved algorithm based on node-independent validation

The PBFT consensus algorithm solves the Byzantine node tolerance problem of Raft and Paxos consensus algorithms, but the three-stage confirmation leads to its poor scalability and high communication latency . In response to above problems, this paper proposes an improved PBFT algorithm based on node-independent validation, briefly as V-PBFT. V-PBFT divides nodes into a double layer structure with multiple leaders, and sets up global validation nodes, intra-group followers, suspicious nodes and malicious nodes. Firstly, V-PBFT adopts the PBFT protocol to reach consensus among leaders. Validation nodes guarantee the consistency of the state of leaders. Then, leaders broadcast I n t r a − c o n s e n s u s messages to intra-group followers. Secondly, validation nodes broadcast V e r i f y messages to all nodes except malicious nodes and leaders. The messages from the leader and validation nodes are mutually verified, enabling followers to judge the correctness of client requests. Finally, the credit value is set for followers to reduce the probability on malicious view-changes. Experimental results show that V-PBFT reduces the communication complexity of PBFT from the quadratic level to the linear level and thus its communication latency is significantly reduced. • The communication complexity of V-PBFT is O ( N ) . • It improves robustness by combining the view-change process with credit mechanism. • Followers prioritize to ask correct client requests instead of lunching view changes. • Its consensus performance is better than that of the classic HotStuff and PBFT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Networks
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111307
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Byzantine improved algorithm based on node-independent validation

Anqi Li, Q. Y. Zhang, Yingbiao Yao, Xin Xu
Computer Networks
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
article

Practical Byzantine improved algorithm based on node-independent validation

Anqi Li, Q. Y. Zhang, Yingbiao Yao, Xin Xu
article en

Abstract

The PBFT consensus algorithm solves the Byzantine node tolerance problem of Raft and Paxos consensus algorithms, but the three-stage confirmation leads to its poor scalability and high communication latency . In response to above problems, this paper proposes an improved PBFT algorithm based on node-independent validation, briefly as V-PBFT. V-PBFT divides nodes into a double layer structure with multiple leaders, and sets up global validation nodes, intra-group followers, suspicious nodes and malicious nodes. Firstly, V-PBFT adopts the PBFT protocol to reach consensus among leaders. Validation nodes guarantee the consistency of the state of leaders. Then, leaders broadcast I n t r a − c o n s e n s u s messages to intra-group followers. Secondly, validation nodes broadcast V e r i f y messages to all nodes except malicious nodes and leaders. The messages from the leader and validation nodes are mutually verified, enabling followers to judge the correctness of client requests. Finally, the credit value is set for followers to reduce the probability on malicious view-changes. Experimental results show that V-PBFT reduces the communication complexity of PBFT from the quadratic level to the linear level and thus its communication latency is significantly reduced. • The communication complexity of V-PBFT is O ( N ) . • It improves robustness by combining the view-change process with credit mechanism. • Followers prioritize to ask correct client requests instead of lunching view changes. • Its consensus performance is better than that of the classic HotStuff and PBFT.

Computer NetworksVol. 265
Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.