Pain-related support seeking? Situating the response to pain within the social context using a sample of women experiencing menstrual pain

The current study explored whether "pain catastrophizing" in a sample of women experiencing menstrual pain can change over time as a function of perceived social support. All participants were cisgender women aged between 18 and 50 years of age, residing in Australia, and who had experienced menstruation within the past year. Participants completed two online surveys approximately 1-year apart, and participants were included if they indicated some degree of menstrual pain at baseline (Time 1, T1) (N = 2006 at T1 and N = 487 at T2). A significant negative association was found between perceived social support (T1) and pain catastrophizing (T2), when reports of pain catastrophizing at T1 were controlled for. This remained significant when the model was adjusted for the potential confounders: age, menstrual pain level, and endometriosis diagnosis (all assessed at T1). These findings demonstrate how "pain catastrophizing" in women with menstrual pain is, at least in part, a function of the broader social environment. This suggests that "pain catastrophizing" might be a well-intentioned and understandable pain-related support seeking strategy that manifests in response to a lack of adequate social support. It might be beneficial for psychological interventions to consider people's social network to ensure that they are able to get the support that they need.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-025-00569-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Menstrual Health and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pain-related support seeking? Situating the response to pain within the social context using a sample of women experiencing menstrual pain

David Skvarc, Emma M. Marshall, Antonina Mikocka‐Walus, Subhadra Evans et al.
1 citations
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Menstrual Health and Disorders
1.88
article

Pain-related support seeking? Situating the response to pain within the social context using a sample of women experiencing menstrual pain

David Skvarc, Emma M. Marshall, Antonina Mikocka‐Walus, Subhadra Evans, Marilla Druitt, Anat Cossen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The current study explored whether "pain catastrophizing" in a sample of women experiencing menstrual pain can change over time as a function of perceived social support. All participants were cisgender women aged between 18 and 50 years of age, residing in Australia, and who had experienced menstruation within the past year. Participants completed two online surveys approximately 1-year apart, and participants were included if they indicated some degree of menstrual pain at baseline (Time 1, T1) (N = 2006 at T1 and N = 487 at T2). A significant negative association was found between perceived social support (T1) and pain catastrophizing (T2), when reports of pain catastrophizing at T1 were controlled for. This remained significant when the model was adjusted for the potential confounders: age, menstrual pain level, and endometriosis diagnosis (all assessed at T1). These findings demonstrate how "pain catastrophizing" in women with menstrual pain is, at least in part, a function of the broader social environment. This suggests that "pain catastrophizing" might be a well-intentioned and understandable pain-related support seeking strategy that manifests in response to a lack of adequate social support. It might be beneficial for psychological interventions to consider people's social network to ensure that they are able to get the support that they need.

Journal of Behavioral MedicineVol. 48(4)
Deakin University (AU), Geelong Hospital (AU)
Deakin University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Menstrual Health and Disorders
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.