177. Assessing Regional Sagittal Craniosynostosis Severity Using the CraniorateTM Machine Learning Toolset

PURPOSE: Sagittal craniosynostosis (SC) can affect three distinct regions of the skull: frontal, central, and posterior. Existing literature mainly focuses on manually defined anatomical measurements to quantify these different components. CranioRateTM is an advanced supervised machine learning toolset able to characterize and quantify craniosynostosis severity, validated by expert surgeon ratings. The aim of this study is to describe the development of regional severity scores (rSSS) using the CranioRate machine learning toolset. METHODS: Our study population included patients with and without SC. Demographic information was collected. The sagittal severity scores were predicted using a regression model, mapping skull shape descriptors to 50 consensus expert ratings. Principal component regression was used to generate a model of regional skull variation in a large cohort of patients with SC and a matched control population. These regions were divided and decomposed to assess the regional component of sagittal severity. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) were conducted to assess the AUC (Area Under curve) for rSSS. RESULTS: The experimental group had 195 patients with SC, and the control group had 170 without SC. Demographic variables were similar in both groups. Regression pattens formed three distinct regions: frontal, central, and posterior encompassing 94.3% of skull morphology. Another baseline region was formed from the remaining morphology. The AUC for comparing the 3 rSSS to control skulls was 0.997 for frontal, 0.998 for central, and 0.994 for posterior regions. CONCLUSION: The very high AUC values for the rSSS indicate that the regional scores are highly effective at identifying the presence of sagittal craniosynostosis (SC). CranioRate’s advanced machine learning algorithm allows for precise and comprehensive measurement of regional sagittal severity. This tool can help surgeons educate patients, conduct research, and enhance clinical care, adding regional insight to the objective sagittal severity score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gox.0001112656.13564.f4
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

177. Assessing Regional Sagittal Craniosynostosis Severity Using the CraniorateTM Machine Learning Toolset

Shireen Elhabian, Nawazish Khan, Janina Kueper, Nicolás M. Kass et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

177. Assessing Regional Sagittal Craniosynostosis Severity Using the CraniorateTM Machine Learning Toolset

Shireen Elhabian, Nawazish Khan, Janina Kueper, Nicolás M. Kass, A. M. Rogers, J. B. Wagoner, Wenzheng Tao, Jesse A. Goldstein, Ross Whitaker, Krithika Iyer, Angel Dixon, Tobi Somorin
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sagittal craniosynostosis (SC) can affect three distinct regions of the skull: frontal, central, and posterior. Existing literature mainly focuses on manually defined anatomical measurements to quantify these different components. CranioRateTM is an advanced supervised machine learning toolset able to characterize and quantify craniosynostosis severity, validated by expert surgeon ratings. The aim of this study is to describe the development of regional severity scores (rSSS) using the CranioRate machine learning toolset. METHODS: Our study population included patients with and without SC. Demographic information was collected. The sagittal severity scores were predicted using a regression model, mapping skull shape descriptors to 50 consensus expert ratings. Principal component regression was used to generate a model of regional skull variation in a large cohort of patients with SC and a matched control population. These regions were divided and decomposed to assess the regional component of sagittal severity. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) were conducted to assess the AUC (Area Under curve) for rSSS. RESULTS: The experimental group had 195 patients with SC, and the control group had 170 without SC. Demographic variables were similar in both groups. Regression pattens formed three distinct regions: frontal, central, and posterior encompassing 94.3% of skull morphology. Another baseline region was formed from the remaining morphology. The AUC for comparing the 3 rSSS to control skulls was 0.997 for frontal, 0.998 for central, and 0.994 for posterior regions. CONCLUSION: The very high AUC values for the rSSS indicate that the regional scores are highly effective at identifying the presence of sagittal craniosynostosis (SC). CranioRate’s advanced machine learning algorithm allows for precise and comprehensive measurement of regional sagittal severity. This tool can help surgeons educate patients, conduct research, and enhance clinical care, adding regional insight to the objective sagittal severity score.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 13(S1)
University of Utah (US), Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.