SP32. Understanding Variation in Bra Cup Sizing Among Leading Manufacturers - A Guide for Patients and Surgeons

PURPOSE: Bra size is commonly-used as a metric when patients and plastic surgeons discuss goal size in breast augmentation or reduction procedures. Variations in bra sizing between different manufacturers can affect patient-surgeon communication, expectations, and postoperative satisfaction. This study quantifies bra cup volume across a range of alphanumeric sizes and manufacturers in order to describe the variance and improve preoperative communication and shared decision-making. METHODS: Bras sized 36A-DD from seven popular manufacturers were fit to a flat-chested mannequin and filled using custom breast sizers. Sizers were weighed and converted to volume, and statistical differences in cup volume between manufacturers were assessed at each size. RESULTS: Cup volume varied significantly between manufacturers at all sizes, with larger cup sizes showing greater variance. Standard deviation in mean cup volume (cc), across all manufacturers, was A: 30.9, B: 40.1, C: 62.2, D: 69.7, and DD: 122.8. Calvin Klein and Hanes ran small, while Wacoal ran larger at sizes C-DD. Wacoal was significantly larger than both Hanes and Calvin Klein at sizes 36C (P<0.05 & P<0.01) and 36D (P<0.05 & P<0.005), and was significantly larger than Calvin Klein at 36DD (P<0.005). Variation across manufacturers was observed at cup sizes A and B, though individual manufacturer trends were less clear. Soma was significantly larger than Victoria’s Secret at size 36A (P<0.005) and Victoria’s Secret was significantly larger than Calvin Klein at 36B (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a reference for surgeons and patients when discussing goal breast size after augmentation and reduction procedures. This data is especially useful for larger cup sizes, where variation in cup volume across manufacturers is the greatest. The ability to convert alphanumeric sizing to volume for different manufacturers will enable more accurate communication and lead to greater patient understanding and satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gox.0001112884.78047.0a
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Material Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SP32. Understanding Variation in Bra Cup Sizing Among Leading Manufacturers - A Guide for Patients and Surgeons

Vikram G. Mookerjee, Jennifer Rodriguez, David P. Alper, Kuo Zhao et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Metallurgy and Material Science
article

SP32. Understanding Variation in Bra Cup Sizing Among Leading Manufacturers - A Guide for Patients and Surgeons

Vikram G. Mookerjee, Jennifer Rodriguez, David P. Alper, Kuo Zhao, Jake Moscarelli, Paris D. Butler, Abigail Judge, Martin J. Carney, Brogan Evans
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bra size is commonly-used as a metric when patients and plastic surgeons discuss goal size in breast augmentation or reduction procedures. Variations in bra sizing between different manufacturers can affect patient-surgeon communication, expectations, and postoperative satisfaction. This study quantifies bra cup volume across a range of alphanumeric sizes and manufacturers in order to describe the variance and improve preoperative communication and shared decision-making. METHODS: Bras sized 36A-DD from seven popular manufacturers were fit to a flat-chested mannequin and filled using custom breast sizers. Sizers were weighed and converted to volume, and statistical differences in cup volume between manufacturers were assessed at each size. RESULTS: Cup volume varied significantly between manufacturers at all sizes, with larger cup sizes showing greater variance. Standard deviation in mean cup volume (cc), across all manufacturers, was A: 30.9, B: 40.1, C: 62.2, D: 69.7, and DD: 122.8. Calvin Klein and Hanes ran small, while Wacoal ran larger at sizes C-DD. Wacoal was significantly larger than both Hanes and Calvin Klein at sizes 36C (P<0.05 & P<0.01) and 36D (P<0.05 & P<0.005), and was significantly larger than Calvin Klein at 36DD (P<0.005). Variation across manufacturers was observed at cup sizes A and B, though individual manufacturer trends were less clear. Soma was significantly larger than Victoria’s Secret at size 36A (P<0.005) and Victoria’s Secret was significantly larger than Calvin Klein at 36B (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a reference for surgeons and patients when discussing goal breast size after augmentation and reduction procedures. This data is especially useful for larger cup sizes, where variation in cup volume across manufacturers is the greatest. The ability to convert alphanumeric sizing to volume for different manufacturers will enable more accurate communication and lead to greater patient understanding and satisfaction.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 13(S1)
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Metallurgy and Material Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.