Picking first arrivals in hydroacoustic seismograms from MERMAID floats

Floating seismometers (‘MERMAIDs’) operating in the noisy environment of the world’s oceans pose a challenge for picking the time of earthquake first arrivals. We report on an experiment to estimate the errors in picked arrivals from 49 MERMAIDS operating in the South Pacific, using two independent strategies. For 15 events, the same arrivals were redundandly picked by several analysts, allowing for a direct estimate of error distributions. Standard errors in times from MERMAID seismograms vary from 0.2 s for close events at mantle depths in the Kermadec subduction zone to more than 2 s for crustal events at large epicentral distance. In a second experiment we analysed the a posteriori misfits after tomographically inverting all events. The residual traveltime misfit is consistent with the error estimates from the first experiment, but also shows inconsistencies with arrival times from the ISC-EHB and NEIC catalogues, which we attribute to errors in the published hypocentres and/or origin times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seismica
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v4i1.1505
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Picking first arrivals in hydroacoustic seismograms from MERMAID floats

Karin Sigloch, Fanchao Kong, Joel D. Simon, Sébastien Bonnieux et al.
3 citations
Seismica
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
5.60
article

Picking first arrivals in hydroacoustic seismograms from MERMAID floats

Karin Sigloch, Fanchao Kong, Joel D. Simon, Sébastien Bonnieux, Junko Yoshimitsu, Masayuki Obayashi, Hoang Nguyen, Guust Nolet, Sirawich Pipatprathanporn, Qi Zhang, Yuko Kondō, Hiroko Sogioka
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Floating seismometers (‘MERMAIDs’) operating in the noisy environment of the world’s oceans pose a challenge for picking the time of earthquake first arrivals. We report on an experiment to estimate the errors in picked arrivals from 49 MERMAIDS operating in the South Pacific, using two independent strategies. For 15 events, the same arrivals were redundandly picked by several analysts, allowing for a direct estimate of error distributions. Standard errors in times from MERMAID seismograms vary from 0.2 s for close events at mantle depths in the Kermadec subduction zone to more than 2 s for crustal events at large epicentral distance. In a second experiment we analysed the a posteriori misfits after tomographically inverting all events. The residual traveltime misfit is consistent with the error estimates from the first experiment, but also shows inconsistencies with arrival times from the ISC-EHB and NEIC catalogues, which we attribute to errors in the published hypocentres and/or origin times.

SeismicaVol. 4(1)
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP), Princeton University (US), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Princeton Public Schools (US), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), University of Da Nang (VN), Dynamic Research (United States) (US), Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (FR), Kobe University (JP)
National Science Foundation, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Southern University of Science and Technology, European Research Council, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
5.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.