Comparative evaluation and selection of heat exchangers using multicriteria decision-making

• A heat exchanger selection framework using multi-criteria decision-making is proposed. • Requirements and criteria for systematically comparing heat exchanger options are presented. • A knowledge base has been built to facilitate comparison of each identified requirement. • Evaluation metrics are proposed to enhance decision quality and efficiency. This study presents a well-structured method for comparing and selecting HE technologies for an IES. The decision to select a HE for a particular IES configuration can vary greatly depending not only on engineering requirements but also on the customer’s specific demand. In other words, the HE selection for IES requires a multicriteria decision- making approach, taking into account diverse technical, economic, and safety aspects, as well as the relative priorities considered by energy users. This study employs a HE evaluation approach combining multicriteria decision-making techniques widely used in various industries: QFD and AHP techniques. Of particular interest is the use of the proposed method to select a high-temperature HEs that couples advanced nuclear reactors and industrial processes. To build a practical basis for comparing HEs within the proposed framework, efforts were made to identify the various HEs requirements for IES purposes. In addition, leveraging the insights obtained from the literature review and the market survey of commercial HE suppliers, a knowledge base was built to facilitate the comparison of each requirement across various HE designs. Also, evaluation metrics were identified for HE requirements with a robust rationale to enhance the quality of decisions made throughout the proposed evaluation process. The evaluation procedure and knowledge base described in this study can provide a useful basis for those interested in screening the appropriate HE designs for various IES scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114066
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation and selection of heat exchangers using multicriteria decision-making

Sunming Qin, Junsoo Yoo, Silvino A. Balderrama Prieto, Hansol Kim et al.
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Process Optimization and Integration
article

Comparative evaluation and selection of heat exchangers using multicriteria decision-making

Sunming Qin, Junsoo Yoo, Silvino A. Balderrama Prieto, Hansol Kim, Erik Hisahara
article en

Abstract

• A heat exchanger selection framework using multi-criteria decision-making is proposed. • Requirements and criteria for systematically comparing heat exchanger options are presented. • A knowledge base has been built to facilitate comparison of each identified requirement. • Evaluation metrics are proposed to enhance decision quality and efficiency. This study presents a well-structured method for comparing and selecting HE technologies for an IES. The decision to select a HE for a particular IES configuration can vary greatly depending not only on engineering requirements but also on the customer’s specific demand. In other words, the HE selection for IES requires a multicriteria decision- making approach, taking into account diverse technical, economic, and safety aspects, as well as the relative priorities considered by energy users. This study employs a HE evaluation approach combining multicriteria decision-making techniques widely used in various industries: QFD and AHP techniques. Of particular interest is the use of the proposed method to select a high-temperature HEs that couples advanced nuclear reactors and industrial processes. To build a practical basis for comparing HEs within the proposed framework, efforts were made to identify the various HEs requirements for IES purposes. In addition, leveraging the insights obtained from the literature review and the market survey of commercial HE suppliers, a knowledge base was built to facilitate the comparison of each requirement across various HE designs. Also, evaluation metrics were identified for HE requirements with a robust rationale to enhance the quality of decisions made throughout the proposed evaluation process. The evaluation procedure and knowledge base described in this study can provide a useful basis for those interested in screening the appropriate HE designs for various IES scenarios.

Nuclear Engineering and DesignVol. 439
Pennsylvania State University (US), Idaho National Laboratory (US), Texas A&M University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Process Optimization and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.