Anti-Cytokine Autoantibodies in Inborn Errors of Immunity with Immune Dysregulation

Introduction Anti-cytokine autoantibodies can guide understanding of disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Examples include anti-interferon (IFN) gamma in disseminated nontuberculous mycobacterial infection; anti-GMCSF in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, disseminated nocardiosis, and cryptococcal meningitis; and anti-IFN alpha autoantibodies exacerbating SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) infection. We sought anti-cytokine autoantibodies in inborn errors of immunity (IEI) patients with immune dysregulatory features. Methods We tested the serum of patients with STAT1 gain of function (GOF) (N = 53), DOCK8 deficiency (N = 57), CTLA4 haploinsufficiency (N = 16), and WAS (N = 16) for anti-cytokine autoantibodies using a 21-cytokine panel via a Luminex bead–based multiplex immunoassay. Those with high levels of autoantibodies were assessed for neutralizing activity by flow cytometry if available. Results Patients had more anti-cytokine antibodies of a wider variety than healthy controls (N = 62) despite being younger. Neutralizing anti-GMCSF autoantibodies were found in 1/62 healthy controls, while 2/62 had high non-neutralizing anti-IFNg antibodies. In contrast, high levels of neutralizing anti-IFNa and anti-IFNw antibodies were found in two patients (STAT1 GOF and CTLA4 haploinsufficiency), while neutralizing anti-IFN-lambda2 and anti-IFN-lambda3 antibodies were found in three patients (two WAS and one CTLA4 haploinsufficiency). High levels of different anti-cytokine autoantibodies were detected in 2/16 CTLA4 patients, 2/53 STAT1 GOF patients, 3/16 WAS patients, and 4/57 DOCK8 deficiency patients (see Table 1). Some patients had more than one type of anti-cytokine autoantibodies. Table 1.Prevalence of high anti-cytokine autoantibodies.Positive anti-cytokine autoantibodyAll Healthy Controls (N = 62)Young Healthy Controls (<40y) (subset, N = 21)STAT1 GOF (N = 53)DOCK8 (N = 57)WAS (N = 16)CTLA4 (N = 16)Any high positive N (%)3 (4.8%)1 (5%)2 (3.8%)4 (7.0%)3 (18.8%)2 (12.5%)Anti-GMCSF1^ (1.6%)1x (5%)Anti-IFNg2x (3.2%)Anti-IL122 (3.5%)Anti-IL23Anti-IFNa1^ (1.9%)1^ (6.25%)Anti-IFNw1^ (1.9%)1^ (6.25%)Anti-IFNL21 (1.8%)2^ (12.5%)1^ (6.25%)Anti-IFNL31 (1.8%)1^ (6.25%)1^ (6.25%)Anti-TNFa1 (1.9%)2 (3.5%)2 (12.5%)Anti-TNFbAnti-IL61 (6.25%)Anti-IL17AAnti-IL101 (1.8%)Anti-IL221 (1.8%)High levels of anti-cytokine autoantibodies (median fluorescence intensity >5,000) were detected in some patients with inborn errors of immunity. All values are expressed in number (%).^Neutralizing antibodies.xNon-neutralizing binding antibodies. Conclusions Patients with IEI and immune dysregulation had more anti-cytokine autoantibodies than healthy controls and of a wider variety. Different IEIs had different anti-cytokine autoantibodies, suggesting disease-specific patterns of anti-cytokine autoantibodies. The contributions of these and other autoantibodies to the clinical presentations and outcomes will be important to determine prospectively in future immune deficiency and other cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Immunity
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70962/cis2025abstract.108
Primary Topic
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti-Cytokine Autoantibodies in Inborn Errors of Immunity with Immune Dysregulation

Gülbû Uzel, Luigi Daniele Notarangelo, Elizabeth Karanja, Steven M. Holland et al.
Journal of Human Immunity
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
article

Anti-Cytokine Autoantibodies in Inborn Errors of Immunity with Immune Dysregulation

Gülbû Uzel, Luigi Daniele Notarangelo, Elizabeth Karanja, Steven M. Holland, Lindsey B. Rosen, Chioma Udemgba, Alexandra F. Freeman, Su‐Wan Bianca Chan
article en

Abstract

Introduction Anti-cytokine autoantibodies can guide understanding of disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Examples include anti-interferon (IFN) gamma in disseminated nontuberculous mycobacterial infection; anti-GMCSF in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, disseminated nocardiosis, and cryptococcal meningitis; and anti-IFN alpha autoantibodies exacerbating SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) infection. We sought anti-cytokine autoantibodies in inborn errors of immunity (IEI) patients with immune dysregulatory features. Methods We tested the serum of patients with STAT1 gain of function (GOF) (N = 53), DOCK8 deficiency (N = 57), CTLA4 haploinsufficiency (N = 16), and WAS (N = 16) for anti-cytokine autoantibodies using a 21-cytokine panel via a Luminex bead–based multiplex immunoassay. Those with high levels of autoantibodies were assessed for neutralizing activity by flow cytometry if available. Results Patients had more anti-cytokine antibodies of a wider variety than healthy controls (N = 62) despite being younger. Neutralizing anti-GMCSF autoantibodies were found in 1/62 healthy controls, while 2/62 had high non-neutralizing anti-IFNg antibodies. In contrast, high levels of neutralizing anti-IFNa and anti-IFNw antibodies were found in two patients (STAT1 GOF and CTLA4 haploinsufficiency), while neutralizing anti-IFN-lambda2 and anti-IFN-lambda3 antibodies were found in three patients (two WAS and one CTLA4 haploinsufficiency). High levels of different anti-cytokine autoantibodies were detected in 2/16 CTLA4 patients, 2/53 STAT1 GOF patients, 3/16 WAS patients, and 4/57 DOCK8 deficiency patients (see Table 1). Some patients had more than one type of anti-cytokine autoantibodies. Table 1.Prevalence of high anti-cytokine autoantibodies.Positive anti-cytokine autoantibodyAll Healthy Controls (N = 62)Young Healthy Controls (<40y) (subset, N = 21)STAT1 GOF (N = 53)DOCK8 (N = 57)WAS (N = 16)CTLA4 (N = 16)Any high positive N (%)3 (4.8%)1 (5%)2 (3.8%)4 (7.0%)3 (18.8%)2 (12.5%)Anti-GMCSF1^ (1.6%)1x (5%)Anti-IFNg2x (3.2%)Anti-IL122 (3.5%)Anti-IL23Anti-IFNa1^ (1.9%)1^ (6.25%)Anti-IFNw1^ (1.9%)1^ (6.25%)Anti-IFNL21 (1.8%)2^ (12.5%)1^ (6.25%)Anti-IFNL31 (1.8%)1^ (6.25%)1^ (6.25%)Anti-TNFa1 (1.9%)2 (3.5%)2 (12.5%)Anti-TNFbAnti-IL61 (6.25%)Anti-IL17AAnti-IL101 (1.8%)Anti-IL221 (1.8%)High levels of anti-cytokine autoantibodies (median fluorescence intensity >5,000) were detected in some patients with inborn errors of immunity. All values are expressed in number (%).^Neutralizing antibodies.xNon-neutralizing binding antibodies. Conclusions Patients with IEI and immune dysregulation had more anti-cytokine autoantibodies than healthy controls and of a wider variety. Different IEIs had different anti-cytokine autoantibodies, suggesting disease-specific patterns of anti-cytokine autoantibodies. The contributions of these and other autoantibodies to the clinical presentations and outcomes will be important to determine prospectively in future immune deficiency and other cohorts.

Journal of Human ImmunityVol. 1(CIS2025)
National Institutes of Health (US), KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.