94. Surgeon Experience and Outcomes in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A 10-year Single Surgeon Analysis

PURPOSE: Microsurgery has become increasingly popular for breast reconstruction, with the DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator) flap being one of the most utilized methods. Achieving desirable outcomes from this technically demanding operation relies on a plastic surgeon’s expertise. While surgeons receive rigorous training throughout their residency and fellowship programs, plastic surgeons are believed to continue refining and improving their performance in independent practice. This study evaluates the effect of surgeon experience on clinical outcomes in microsurgical DIEP flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: Institutional IRB approval was obtained prior to the initiation of this study. A review of consecutive DIEP flaps performed by a single surgeon from 2013 to 2023 was performed. Comprehensive data was collected, including patient demographics, medical history, operative details, and postoperative complications. Patients were divided into “early” and “late” groups based on the midpoint date (July 21st, 2018) between the earliest and latest surgeries. Statistical analyses were conducted using Student’s t-tests, chi-squared analysis with Fisher’s exact test, and multivariable regressions controlling for comorbidities. RESULTS: The study included a total of 628 patients, with 242 in the early group and 386 in the late group. The early group had a higher mean age (52.31 vs. 50.48 years, p=0.027) and BMI (29.94 vs. 28.84, p=0.016). Additionally, the early group exhibited a higher percentage of patients with hypertension (35.1% vs. 26.7%) but a lower percentage with diabetes (14.0% vs. 8.0%). After controlling for potential confounders, the late group was significantly associated with fewer revision surgeries (IRR=0.677, CI=[0.54 0.85], p=0.0007) and a shorter length of stay (IRR=0.615, CI=[0.56 0.68], p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that even with extensive training, plastic surgeons continue to improve their practice and surgical outcomes through accumulated experience. These findings highlight the learning curve and volume-outcome relationship within plastic surgery, and specifically, microsurgical breast reconstruction. Moreover, they underscore the importance of ongoing practice to achieve optimal results in complex procedures like DIEP breast reconstruction. Therefore, patients may consider the experience level of their plastic surgeon a critical factor when making their choice of surgeon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gox.0001112328.57671.8d
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

94. Surgeon Experience and Outcomes in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A 10-year Single Surgeon Analysis

Joseph A. Ricci, Evan Rothchild, Neil Tanna, Sunday O. Popoola et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

94. Surgeon Experience and Outcomes in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A 10-year Single Surgeon Analysis

Joseph A. Ricci, Evan Rothchild, Neil Tanna, Sunday O. Popoola, Isabelle T. Smith
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Microsurgery has become increasingly popular for breast reconstruction, with the DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator) flap being one of the most utilized methods. Achieving desirable outcomes from this technically demanding operation relies on a plastic surgeon’s expertise. While surgeons receive rigorous training throughout their residency and fellowship programs, plastic surgeons are believed to continue refining and improving their performance in independent practice. This study evaluates the effect of surgeon experience on clinical outcomes in microsurgical DIEP flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: Institutional IRB approval was obtained prior to the initiation of this study. A review of consecutive DIEP flaps performed by a single surgeon from 2013 to 2023 was performed. Comprehensive data was collected, including patient demographics, medical history, operative details, and postoperative complications. Patients were divided into “early” and “late” groups based on the midpoint date (July 21st, 2018) between the earliest and latest surgeries. Statistical analyses were conducted using Student’s t-tests, chi-squared analysis with Fisher’s exact test, and multivariable regressions controlling for comorbidities. RESULTS: The study included a total of 628 patients, with 242 in the early group and 386 in the late group. The early group had a higher mean age (52.31 vs. 50.48 years, p=0.027) and BMI (29.94 vs. 28.84, p=0.016). Additionally, the early group exhibited a higher percentage of patients with hypertension (35.1% vs. 26.7%) but a lower percentage with diabetes (14.0% vs. 8.0%). After controlling for potential confounders, the late group was significantly associated with fewer revision surgeries (IRR=0.677, CI=[0.54 0.85], p=0.0007) and a shorter length of stay (IRR=0.615, CI=[0.56 0.68], p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that even with extensive training, plastic surgeons continue to improve their practice and surgical outcomes through accumulated experience. These findings highlight the learning curve and volume-outcome relationship within plastic surgery, and specifically, microsurgical breast reconstruction. Moreover, they underscore the importance of ongoing practice to achieve optimal results in complex procedures like DIEP breast reconstruction. Therefore, patients may consider the experience level of their plastic surgeon a critical factor when making their choice of surgeon.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 13(S1)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.