Still accurate to call it ‘Campaign-Style’? The standardization of campaign-style governance in China's environmental management, with the water Cleanup Project in the Huai River Basin as a case study

ABSTRACT This paper examines why and how campaign-style governance (CSG) in China's environmental management has undergone a standardization process and identifies the consequences of this standardization. Drawing on the 25-year implementation of the Water Cleanup Project in the Huai River Basin as a case study, we analyze two major revisions undertaken by the Central Government to standardize the application of CSG: the ‘campaign package restrictions’ and the ‘technology-based adjustment’. We find that these revisions have transformed CSG into a hybrid governance, which combines the predictability of conventional governance approaches with the flexibility characteristic of non-conventional governance approaches. This transformation raises important questions about the institutionalization of CSG, particularly regarding the pace, stability, and legitimacy of the institutionalization process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Policy
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2025.224
Citations
1
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Still accurate to call it ‘Campaign-Style’? The standardization of campaign-style governance in China's environmental management, with the water Cleanup Project in the Huai River Basin as a case study

Tong Xu, Yuan Ma
1 citations
Water Policy
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
8.52
article

Still accurate to call it ‘Campaign-Style’? The standardization of campaign-style governance in China's environmental management, with the water Cleanup Project in the Huai River Basin as a case study

Tong Xu, Yuan Ma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines why and how campaign-style governance (CSG) in China's environmental management has undergone a standardization process and identifies the consequences of this standardization. Drawing on the 25-year implementation of the Water Cleanup Project in the Huai River Basin as a case study, we analyze two major revisions undertaken by the Central Government to standardize the application of CSG: the ‘campaign package restrictions’ and the ‘technology-based adjustment’. We find that these revisions have transformed CSG into a hybrid governance, which combines the predictability of conventional governance approaches with the flexibility characteristic of non-conventional governance approaches. This transformation raises important questions about the institutionalization of CSG, particularly regarding the pace, stability, and legitimacy of the institutionalization process.

Water PolicyVol. 27(5)
South China Normal University (CN), Utrecht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.