The Study of Racism and Policing in the United States

We begin this article by discussing two moments, in the late 1800s and late 1900s, in which the racist views of influential political scientists fundamentally shaped research on policing. In contrast, today's scholarship, breaking sharply with research of the past, does not attempt to justify racist policing but to study it. The dominant approach today follows a racial disparities framework, which maps out the uneven allocation of police harms. As we discuss, these studies have made valuable contributions to the field and to real-world efforts to resist the damage done by police. At the same time, however, the racial disparities framework has limitations that make it difficult for scholars to understand racist police oppression. We conclude by arguing that, to take the next step forward, future scholarship should follow the lead of and expand upon work that centers the voices of the highly policed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Political Science
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-033123-124752
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
42.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Study of Racism and Policing in the United States

Spencer Piston, Clive Walker, Kaneesha R. Johnson, Selma Hedlund
5 citations
Annual Review of Political Science
Policing Practices and Perceptions
42.61
article

The Study of Racism and Policing in the United States

Spencer Piston, Clive Walker, Kaneesha R. Johnson, Selma Hedlund
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We begin this article by discussing two moments, in the late 1800s and late 1900s, in which the racist views of influential political scientists fundamentally shaped research on policing. In contrast, today's scholarship, breaking sharply with research of the past, does not attempt to justify racist policing but to study it. The dominant approach today follows a racial disparities framework, which maps out the uneven allocation of police harms. As we discuss, these studies have made valuable contributions to the field and to real-world efforts to resist the damage done by police. At the same time, however, the racial disparities framework has limitations that make it difficult for scholars to understand racist police oppression. We conclude by arguing that, to take the next step forward, future scholarship should follow the lead of and expand upon work that centers the voices of the highly policed.

Annual Review of Political ScienceVol. 28(1)
Boston University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
42.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Study of Racism and Policing in the United States — Spencer Piston, Clive Walker, et al. · Annual Review of Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS