Identifying Basic Emotions and Action Units from Facial Photographs with ChatGPT

Abstract Recognising facial expressions of emotion is crucial for social interactions. In addition, identifying these expressions underlies the study of social cognition, consumer behaviour, and many other fields. Using automated facial coding (AFC), this task can be completed more efficiently while potentially benefitting human-computer interactions. Here, I explored ChatGPT’s ability to recognise expressions of basic emotions using high quality images for which human performance, as well as that of FaceReader (a commercially available software), had previously been collected. In Experiment 1, a forced-choice labelling task found that ChatGPT outperformed both humans and FaceReader in identifying the intended emotions from their expressions. Experiment 2 focussed on the facial action coding system (FACS), requiring ChatGPT to identify activated action units (AUs) and their intensities from these same images. The chatbot’s overall agreement with a FACS-certified specialist was at least as high as FaceReader, and was around the criterion required for human certification. Further, ChatGPT’s detection of a large subset of AUs showed good or very good agreement with the specialist’s coding, comparable with FaceReader’s performance. Finally, although overall intensity ratings showed relatively poor agreement with the human specialist, ratings for several of the AUs agreed well with human coding, especially if a small level of tolerance were acceptable. Taken together, ChatGPT’s ability to perceive human facial expressions and their AUs from high quality images provides a possible alternative to current AFC tools, as well as an interesting avenue for investigation regarding advances in human-computer interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-025-00484-1
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Basic Emotions and Action Units from Facial Photographs with ChatGPT

Robin S. S. Kramer
5 citations
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
Emotion and Mood Recognition
10.59
article

Identifying Basic Emotions and Action Units from Facial Photographs with ChatGPT

Robin S. S. Kramer
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Recognising facial expressions of emotion is crucial for social interactions. In addition, identifying these expressions underlies the study of social cognition, consumer behaviour, and many other fields. Using automated facial coding (AFC), this task can be completed more efficiently while potentially benefitting human-computer interactions. Here, I explored ChatGPT’s ability to recognise expressions of basic emotions using high quality images for which human performance, as well as that of FaceReader (a commercially available software), had previously been collected. In Experiment 1, a forced-choice labelling task found that ChatGPT outperformed both humans and FaceReader in identifying the intended emotions from their expressions. Experiment 2 focussed on the facial action coding system (FACS), requiring ChatGPT to identify activated action units (AUs) and their intensities from these same images. The chatbot’s overall agreement with a FACS-certified specialist was at least as high as FaceReader, and was around the criterion required for human certification. Further, ChatGPT’s detection of a large subset of AUs showed good or very good agreement with the specialist’s coding, comparable with FaceReader’s performance. Finally, although overall intensity ratings showed relatively poor agreement with the human specialist, ratings for several of the AUs agreed well with human coding, especially if a small level of tolerance were acceptable. Taken together, ChatGPT’s ability to perceive human facial expressions and their AUs from high quality images provides a possible alternative to current AFC tools, as well as an interesting avenue for investigation regarding advances in human-computer interactions.

Journal of Nonverbal BehaviorVol. 49(2)
University of Lincoln (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
10.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.