Induction of fresh produce defense response: Mechanism, challenges, and future directions

Induced resistance is a relatively novel and effective approach for managing postharvest disease . Fresh fruit and vegetables are highly susceptible to biotic and abiotic stresses, such as fungal pathogens and suboptimal temperatures, which lead to substantial postharvest losses and reduced shelf life. Once detached, fruit and vegetables continue ripening and senescence, which weakens the tissues, making them vulnerable to pathogens. Physical, chemical, and biological treatments could trigger the innate immune response of fruit and vegetables, which could reduce postharvest loss. This review aims to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the induction of defense responses in fresh produce. Chemical, biological, or physical inducers activate the fresh produce defense pathways, synthesizing defense-related proteins and metabolites, thus stimulating the plant's natural defense against pathogens and environmental stresses. Those inducers often trigger signaling cascades involving phytohormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and signals, orchestrating a complex network of molecular defensive combat fields. While there is progress in the induced resistance field, future challenges remain. These challenges include acquiring more knowledge of the specific defense pathways in different agricultural produce and their potential impact on produce quality and tolerance. Moreover, the inducer should be effective, economical, and safe. Adapting advanced technologies, such as omics approaches and biotechnological tools, holds the potential for the precise modulation of defense responses, leading to the development of tailored strategies for different produce types and specific biotic and abiotic stress. • Various exogenous treatments could prime the fresh produce defense response. • Phytohormones crosstalk will govern which defense response will be activated. • Similar phytohormones regulate ripening, quality, and defense response. • The defense mechanism activates the synthesis of enzymes and secondary metabolites. • Induce defense response improve tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress postharvest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Postharvest Biology and Technology
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113610
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Induction of fresh produce defense response: Mechanism, challenges, and future directions

Noam Alkan, Pankaj Chowdhary
2 citations
Postharvest Biology and Technology
Plant Virus Research Studies
3.50
article

Induction of fresh produce defense response: Mechanism, challenges, and future directions

Noam Alkan, Pankaj Chowdhary
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Induced resistance is a relatively novel and effective approach for managing postharvest disease . Fresh fruit and vegetables are highly susceptible to biotic and abiotic stresses, such as fungal pathogens and suboptimal temperatures, which lead to substantial postharvest losses and reduced shelf life. Once detached, fruit and vegetables continue ripening and senescence, which weakens the tissues, making them vulnerable to pathogens. Physical, chemical, and biological treatments could trigger the innate immune response of fruit and vegetables, which could reduce postharvest loss. This review aims to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the induction of defense responses in fresh produce. Chemical, biological, or physical inducers activate the fresh produce defense pathways, synthesizing defense-related proteins and metabolites, thus stimulating the plant's natural defense against pathogens and environmental stresses. Those inducers often trigger signaling cascades involving phytohormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and signals, orchestrating a complex network of molecular defensive combat fields. While there is progress in the induced resistance field, future challenges remain. These challenges include acquiring more knowledge of the specific defense pathways in different agricultural produce and their potential impact on produce quality and tolerance. Moreover, the inducer should be effective, economical, and safe. Adapting advanced technologies, such as omics approaches and biotechnological tools, holds the potential for the precise modulation of defense responses, leading to the development of tailored strategies for different produce types and specific biotic and abiotic stress. • Various exogenous treatments could prime the fresh produce defense response. • Phytohormones crosstalk will govern which defense response will be activated. • Similar phytohormones regulate ripening, quality, and defense response. • The defense mechanism activates the synthesis of enzymes and secondary metabolites. • Induce defense response improve tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress postharvest.

Postharvest Biology and TechnologyVol. 227
Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Plant Virus Research Studies
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.