No future for future generations: who is international environmental law for?

The idea that the environment must be protected for future generations has been gaining traction in recent years. This article argues that the concept of future generations, as deployed in international environmental law, is, however, deeply exclusionary, with only some humans being envisaged as future generations. It is furthermore argued that the concept is anthropocentric in that it focuses only on human future generations. The article discusses whether the concept can be recast considering these critiques, deploying queer and decolonial approaches to do so. In particular, Indigenous understandings of future generations are highlighted as offering an alternative framing. The article concludes by arguing that legal concepts must be carefully designed to ensure the construction of a future whereby climate change and environmental degradation are addressed in an equitable and just way, providing three pathways that can be used to begin to reframe the concept of future generations accordingly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Rights and the Environment
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2025.0005
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No future for future generations: who is international environmental law for?

Emily Jones
2 citations
Journal of Human Rights and the Environment
Environmental law and policy
31.97
article

No future for future generations: who is international environmental law for?

Emily Jones
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The idea that the environment must be protected for future generations has been gaining traction in recent years. This article argues that the concept of future generations, as deployed in international environmental law, is, however, deeply exclusionary, with only some humans being envisaged as future generations. It is furthermore argued that the concept is anthropocentric in that it focuses only on human future generations. The article discusses whether the concept can be recast considering these critiques, deploying queer and decolonial approaches to do so. In particular, Indigenous understandings of future generations are highlighted as offering an alternative framing. The article concludes by arguing that legal concepts must be carefully designed to ensure the construction of a future whereby climate change and environmental degradation are addressed in an equitable and just way, providing three pathways that can be used to begin to reframe the concept of future generations accordingly.

Journal of Human Rights and the EnvironmentVol. 16(1)
Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Environmental law and policy
31.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No future for future generations: who is international environmental law for? — Emily Jones · Journal of Human Rights and the Environment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS