Modeling the transmission dynamics of African swine fever virus within commercial swine barns: Quantifying the contribution of multiple transmission pathways

The transmission of African swine fever virus (ASFV) within swine barns occurs through direct and indirect pathways. Identifying and quantifying the roles of ASFV dissemination within barns is crucial for developing disease control strategies. We created a stochastic transmission model to examine the ASFV dissemination dynamics through transmission routes within commercial swine barns. We consider seven transmission routes at three disease dynamics levels: within-pens, between-pens, and within-room transmission, along with the transfer of pigs between pens within rooms. We simulated ASFV spread within barns of various sizes and layouts from rooms with a median of 32 pens (IQR: 28-40), where each pen housed a median of 34 pigs (IQR: 29-36). Our model enables tracking the viral load in each pen and monitoring the disease status at the pen level. Results show that between-pen transmission pathways exhibited the highest contribution in spread, accounting for 66.76%, whereas within-pen and within-room pathways account for 26.12% and 7.12%, respectively. Nose-to-nose contact between pens was the primary dissemination route, comprising an average of 46.04%. On the other hand, aerosol transmission within pens had the lowest contribution, accounting for less than 1%. Furthermore, we show that the daily transfer of pigs between pens did not impact the spread of ASFV. On average, at the room level, the combined approach of passive daily surveillance and mortality-focused surveillance enabled ASFV detection within 18 (IQR: 16-19) days. The model allows us to monitor the viral load variation across the room over time, revealing that most of the viral load accumulates in pens closer to the exhaust fans after a month. This work significantly deepens our understanding of ASFV spread within commercial swine production farms in the U.S. and highlights the main transmission pathways that should be prioritized when implementing ASFV countermeasure actions at the room level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemics
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2025.100828
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the transmission dynamics of African swine fever virus within commercial swine barns: Quantifying the contribution of multiple transmission pathways

C. Yeh, Christian Fleming, Jason A. Galvis, Mina Safari et al.
4 citations
Epidemics
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
7.61
article

Modeling the transmission dynamics of African swine fever virus within commercial swine barns: Quantifying the contribution of multiple transmission pathways

C. Yeh, Christian Fleming, Jason A. Galvis, Mina Safari, Aniruddha Deka, Gustavo Machado
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The transmission of African swine fever virus (ASFV) within swine barns occurs through direct and indirect pathways. Identifying and quantifying the roles of ASFV dissemination within barns is crucial for developing disease control strategies. We created a stochastic transmission model to examine the ASFV dissemination dynamics through transmission routes within commercial swine barns. We consider seven transmission routes at three disease dynamics levels: within-pens, between-pens, and within-room transmission, along with the transfer of pigs between pens within rooms. We simulated ASFV spread within barns of various sizes and layouts from rooms with a median of 32 pens (IQR: 28-40), where each pen housed a median of 34 pigs (IQR: 29-36). Our model enables tracking the viral load in each pen and monitoring the disease status at the pen level. Results show that between-pen transmission pathways exhibited the highest contribution in spread, accounting for 66.76%, whereas within-pen and within-room pathways account for 26.12% and 7.12%, respectively. Nose-to-nose contact between pens was the primary dissemination route, comprising an average of 46.04%. On the other hand, aerosol transmission within pens had the lowest contribution, accounting for less than 1%. Furthermore, we show that the daily transfer of pigs between pens did not impact the spread of ASFV. On average, at the room level, the combined approach of passive daily surveillance and mortality-focused surveillance enabled ASFV detection within 18 (IQR: 16-19) days. The model allows us to monitor the viral load variation across the room over time, revealing that most of the viral load accumulates in pens closer to the exhaust fans after a month. This work significantly deepens our understanding of ASFV spread within commercial swine production farms in the U.S. and highlights the main transmission pathways that should be prioritized when implementing ASFV countermeasure actions at the room level.

EpidemicsVol. 51
North Carolina State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
7.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.