Assessing the role of a probabilistic model for guiding storm surge barrier maintenance

Storm surge barriers provide flood protection to many major coastal cities in estuaries around the world. Maintenance of these assets is critical to ensure they remain reliable and continue to comply with national legal protection standards. There are often critical thresholds of environmental conditions, beyond which maintenance work is unsafe to be carried out. However, as storm surge barriers age and with climate change effects such as sea-level rise and possible changes in storminess, periods when environmental conditions exceed set thresholds will occur more frequently, so carrying out the required work in available maintenance windows will become increasingly challenging. Probabilistic models enable the use of ensemble forecasts of upcoming water levels to determine the likelihood of conditions exceeding the threshold and so can inform on decision making regarding maintenance. This paper evaluates a probabilistic model currently in operational use by Rijkswaterstaat, the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, to guide maintenance decisions at the Maeslant barrier in the Netherlands. Sixteen years of historic highwater level forecasts from a combination of European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and Dutch Continental Shelf Model v5 are used with observations from the Hoek van Holland tide gauge to evaluate and sensitivity test the probabilistic model. Binary classification is used to assess the performance of the probabilistic model. Findings show that the model is conservative with 33.1 % of outcomes resulting in a False Alarm. Changing the baseline parameters of critical probability and water level threshold impacts the balance between False Alarm and Miss outcomes. Increasing the critical probability reduces the number of False Alarms but increases the Miss situations, emphasising the trade-off between acceptable risk and time available to carry out maintenance work. This study highlights the delicate balance between model parameter selection and the associated risk with respect to the maintenance of storm surge barriers. • First probabilistic model to use ensemble forecasts to aid decision making of storm surge barrier maintenance. • Hindcast evaluation shows model performs well, providing a useful decision-making guide. • Adjusting model parameters controls the balance between the two incorrect outcomes, False Alarms and Misses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coastal Engineering
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2025.104766
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the role of a probabilistic model for guiding storm surge barrier maintenance

Marc Walraven, Ivan D. Haigh, Sunke Trace-Kleeberg, Annette Zijderveld et al.
1 citations
Coastal Engineering
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
article

Assessing the role of a probabilistic model for guiding storm surge barrier maintenance

Marc Walraven, Ivan D. Haigh, Sunke Trace-Kleeberg, Annette Zijderveld, Susan Gourvenec, Krijn Saman, Elja Huibregtse, Robert Vos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Storm surge barriers provide flood protection to many major coastal cities in estuaries around the world. Maintenance of these assets is critical to ensure they remain reliable and continue to comply with national legal protection standards. There are often critical thresholds of environmental conditions, beyond which maintenance work is unsafe to be carried out. However, as storm surge barriers age and with climate change effects such as sea-level rise and possible changes in storminess, periods when environmental conditions exceed set thresholds will occur more frequently, so carrying out the required work in available maintenance windows will become increasingly challenging. Probabilistic models enable the use of ensemble forecasts of upcoming water levels to determine the likelihood of conditions exceeding the threshold and so can inform on decision making regarding maintenance. This paper evaluates a probabilistic model currently in operational use by Rijkswaterstaat, the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, to guide maintenance decisions at the Maeslant barrier in the Netherlands. Sixteen years of historic highwater level forecasts from a combination of European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and Dutch Continental Shelf Model v5 are used with observations from the Hoek van Holland tide gauge to evaluate and sensitivity test the probabilistic model. Binary classification is used to assess the performance of the probabilistic model. Findings show that the model is conservative with 33.1 % of outcomes resulting in a False Alarm. Changing the baseline parameters of critical probability and water level threshold impacts the balance between False Alarm and Miss outcomes. Increasing the critical probability reduces the number of False Alarms but increases the Miss situations, emphasising the trade-off between acceptable risk and time available to carry out maintenance work. This study highlights the delicate balance between model parameter selection and the associated risk with respect to the maintenance of storm surge barriers. • First probabilistic model to use ensemble forecasts to aid decision making of storm surge barrier maintenance. • Hindcast evaluation shows model performs well, providing a useful decision-making guide. • Adjusting model parameters controls the balance between the two incorrect outcomes, False Alarms and Misses.

Coastal EngineeringVol. 200
National Oceanography Centre (GB), Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management (NL), University of Southampton (GB)
Natural Environment Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.