Undersea cables: The official perspectives expressed in the Pacific region

This research project has investigated the standpoints of Pacific leaders in relation to undersea communication cables. It has examined key documents and statements of the Pacific Islands Forum, the regional grouping of Pacific governments, to determine how undersea cables are viewed. The paper seeks to foreground the positions formulated by Pacific leaders. The paper argues that the views of Pacific leaders, as articulated in official documents and public statements, differ from the views of others. These differing views are reflected in different approaches. Pacific leaders view cables as infrastructures that can enable and enhance digital connectivity and thus support social and economic development outcomes. While donors also view cables as infrastructures that can enable and enhance digital connectivity, they may make decisions about cable infrastructure projects with geopolitical considerations in mind in the current context. Geopolitical manoeuvring and geoeconomic activities receive a great deal of attention amongst the commentariat and some scholars suggest that they are influencing the design of cable systems. This research has found that Pacific leaders are primarily concerned with improving digital connectivity and enhancing cybersecurity. Nonetheless, Pacific leaders are working towards their development objectives strategically in the current geopolitical context. While the Pacific Islands Forum does acknowledge that it is operating within a context of heightened geopolitical competition, it is endeavouring to remain focused on achievement of its development objectives, which include digital connectivity. • Pacific leaders are keen to improve communication access and address cybersecurity. • Pacific leaders view undersea cables as infrastructure that can enable communication access. • While Pacific leaders are acutely aware of geopolitical contestation and are navigating the context deftly, effort is made to focus on development goals, including connectivity, rather than geopolitical issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Policy
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106735
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maritime Security and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Undersea cables: The official perspectives expressed in the Pacific region

Amanda H. A. Watson
1 citations
Marine Policy
Maritime Security and History
2.18
article

Undersea cables: The official perspectives expressed in the Pacific region

Amanda H. A. Watson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This research project has investigated the standpoints of Pacific leaders in relation to undersea communication cables. It has examined key documents and statements of the Pacific Islands Forum, the regional grouping of Pacific governments, to determine how undersea cables are viewed. The paper seeks to foreground the positions formulated by Pacific leaders. The paper argues that the views of Pacific leaders, as articulated in official documents and public statements, differ from the views of others. These differing views are reflected in different approaches. Pacific leaders view cables as infrastructures that can enable and enhance digital connectivity and thus support social and economic development outcomes. While donors also view cables as infrastructures that can enable and enhance digital connectivity, they may make decisions about cable infrastructure projects with geopolitical considerations in mind in the current context. Geopolitical manoeuvring and geoeconomic activities receive a great deal of attention amongst the commentariat and some scholars suggest that they are influencing the design of cable systems. This research has found that Pacific leaders are primarily concerned with improving digital connectivity and enhancing cybersecurity. Nonetheless, Pacific leaders are working towards their development objectives strategically in the current geopolitical context. While the Pacific Islands Forum does acknowledge that it is operating within a context of heightened geopolitical competition, it is endeavouring to remain focused on achievement of its development objectives, which include digital connectivity. • Pacific leaders are keen to improve communication access and address cybersecurity. • Pacific leaders view undersea cables as infrastructure that can enable communication access. • While Pacific leaders are acutely aware of geopolitical contestation and are navigating the context deftly, effort is made to focus on development goals, including connectivity, rather than geopolitical issues.

Marine PolicyVol. 178
Australian National University (AU)
Japan Foundation, New York, University of Hawai'i, Australian Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government, Japan Foundation, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Maritime Security and History
2.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.