Reliability of measuring mandibular movement and condylar position using an optical jaw registration system.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of a digital jaw registration system for measuring mandibular movement and condylar position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on mandibular movement and condylar position were collected from a consecutively recruited sample of 20 functionally healthy adults (age range: 19-77 years; 45% female) using an optoelectronic registration system (Tizian JMA optic; zebris Medical, Isny, Germany). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two calibrated examiners, who exclusively performed the measurements for the entire study period. Condylar position was measured five times on two separate days, approximately one week apart, while mandibular movements were recorded once per appointment. The measurement results were analyzed within (intra-appointment) and compared across both measurement appointments (inter-appointment). Analysis of condylar position involved comparing the condylar positions in the resting position to the maximum intercuspation. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: For mandibular movement, ICCs indicated high reliability for mouth opening (0.95) and protrusion (0.94), with slightly lower values for laterotrusion (0.89 to 0.87), without significant differences between appointments. The condylar position showed an overall intra-appointment ICC value of 0.98. No significant differences were found within or between the examiners, intra-appointment as well as inter-appointment. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of mandibular movements and condylar position relative to habitual occlusion using the tested digital registration system proved to be a reliable procedure. The measurements were not significantly influenced by different examiners. The results confirm the applicability of the device in clinical settings, particularly in functional diagnostics and the digital prosthetic workflow. Although the actual benefits of the application for patients have yet to be established, the present study provides a scientific foundation for future research considering more vulnerable cohorts, particularly patients with a higher average age, reduced dentition, or the presence of temporomandibular disorders.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b6173234
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability of measuring mandibular movement and condylar position using an optical jaw registration system.

Oliver Schierz, Elisabeth Grau, Lisa Marie Brinkmann, Fabian Fenske et al.
1 citations
PubMed
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Reliability of measuring mandibular movement and condylar position using an optical jaw registration system.

Oliver Schierz, Elisabeth Grau, Lisa Marie Brinkmann, Fabian Fenske, Daniel R. Reißmann, Marvin Nebe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of a digital jaw registration system for measuring mandibular movement and condylar position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on mandibular movement and condylar position were collected from a consecutively recruited sample of 20 functionally healthy adults (age range: 19-77 years; 45% female) using an optoelectronic registration system (Tizian JMA optic; zebris Medical, Isny, Germany). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two calibrated examiners, who exclusively performed the measurements for the entire study period. Condylar position was measured five times on two separate days, approximately one week apart, while mandibular movements were recorded once per appointment. The measurement results were analyzed within (intra-appointment) and compared across both measurement appointments (inter-appointment). Analysis of condylar position involved comparing the condylar positions in the resting position to the maximum intercuspation. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: For mandibular movement, ICCs indicated high reliability for mouth opening (0.95) and protrusion (0.94), with slightly lower values for laterotrusion (0.89 to 0.87), without significant differences between appointments. The condylar position showed an overall intra-appointment ICC value of 0.98. No significant differences were found within or between the examiners, intra-appointment as well as inter-appointment. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of mandibular movements and condylar position relative to habitual occlusion using the tested digital registration system proved to be a reliable procedure. The measurements were not significantly influenced by different examiners. The results confirm the applicability of the device in clinical settings, particularly in functional diagnostics and the digital prosthetic workflow. Although the actual benefits of the application for patients have yet to be established, the present study provides a scientific foundation for future research considering more vulnerable cohorts, particularly patients with a higher average age, reduced dentition, or the presence of temporomandibular disorders.

PubMedVol. 29(1)
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.