Protist communities are correlated with abiotic soil factors, but not resources, prey, or predators along a subalpine secondary succession

• Abiotic soil factors are primary drivers of protist community composition. • Biotic factors show limited association with protist community structure. • Protists at higher trophic levels respond more strongly to environmental variation. Protists are pivotal components of soil micro-food webs, influencing microbial functioning and nutrient cycling. While abiotic soil factors consistently drive protist communities, the roles of bottom-up (resources) and top-down (predators) forces remain understudied. The lack of integrative studies on these drivers constrains our understanding of changes in protistan communities. To fill this gap, we investigated a subalpine succession (grassland, shrubland, secondary forest, primary forest) in southwestern China, using 18S rRNA gene sequencing to assess protist communities. We specifically tested how basal plant resources, food web components, and abiotic soil factors shape protist communities and their functional groups (phagotrophic, parasitic, phototrophic). The results showed that overall protist diversity decreased during secondary succession, being lowest in secondary birch forests. Abiotic soil factors, especially soil moisture, total phosphorus, and pH, were strongly correlated with protist community composition, while plant resources, prey, and predators showed weaker associations, except for parasitic protists, which were also associated with plant resources and invertebrate diversity. The community composition of phagotrophic and parasitic protists exhibited more pronounced changes along the succession compared to phototrophic protists. Our findings highlight the dominant role of abiotic soil factors in shaping protist communities, which may lead to a decoupling of above- (plant) and belowground (protist) diversity patterns. Moreover, higher trophic levels within protist communities showed greater sensitivity to succession, indicating functional restructuring in soil micro-food webs during ecosystem development. This integrative perspective enhances our understanding of soil protist communities, highlighting the interactions between abiotic and biotic factors that shape belowground ecosystems across environmental gradients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117310
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protist communities are correlated with abiotic soil factors, but not resources, prey, or predators along a subalpine secondary succession

Anton Potapov, Qiang Wei, Ruyi Luo, Yan Zhang et al.
4 citations
Geoderma
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
article

Protist communities are correlated with abiotic soil factors, but not resources, prey, or predators along a subalpine secondary succession

Anton Potapov, Qiang Wei, Ruyi Luo, Yan Zhang, Ajuan Zhang, Bing Liu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Abiotic soil factors are primary drivers of protist community composition. • Biotic factors show limited association with protist community structure. • Protists at higher trophic levels respond more strongly to environmental variation. Protists are pivotal components of soil micro-food webs, influencing microbial functioning and nutrient cycling. While abiotic soil factors consistently drive protist communities, the roles of bottom-up (resources) and top-down (predators) forces remain understudied. The lack of integrative studies on these drivers constrains our understanding of changes in protistan communities. To fill this gap, we investigated a subalpine succession (grassland, shrubland, secondary forest, primary forest) in southwestern China, using 18S rRNA gene sequencing to assess protist communities. We specifically tested how basal plant resources, food web components, and abiotic soil factors shape protist communities and their functional groups (phagotrophic, parasitic, phototrophic). The results showed that overall protist diversity decreased during secondary succession, being lowest in secondary birch forests. Abiotic soil factors, especially soil moisture, total phosphorus, and pH, were strongly correlated with protist community composition, while plant resources, prey, and predators showed weaker associations, except for parasitic protists, which were also associated with plant resources and invertebrate diversity. The community composition of phagotrophic and parasitic protists exhibited more pronounced changes along the succession compared to phototrophic protists. Our findings highlight the dominant role of abiotic soil factors in shaping protist communities, which may lead to a decoupling of above- (plant) and belowground (protist) diversity patterns. Moreover, higher trophic levels within protist communities showed greater sensitivity to succession, indicating functional restructuring in soil micro-food webs during ecosystem development. This integrative perspective enhances our understanding of soil protist communities, highlighting the interactions between abiotic and biotic factors that shape belowground ecosystems across environmental gradients.

GeodermaVol. 458
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Chengdu Institute of Biology (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of York (GB), University of Göttingen (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council, Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.