Analysis of the Environmental Agenda in Local Mass Media and Social Media in the Context of Social Communication Gaps

The paper deals with the analysis of the environmental agenda setting in local mass media, social media and emerging communication gaps. The theoretical and methodological basis for the study of environmental communication gaps is the theory of agenda setting and the factor model of mass communication by G. Maletzke, who takes into account the "pressure" of the mediator and various social and psychological characteristics of the subjects. The aim of the study is to analyze communication gaps in environmental agenda in mass media and social media in the Chelyabinsk and Sverdlovsk regions. The study applies a set of methods, namely comparative analysis, document analysis with the elements of content analysis, and a survey. Communication gap is understood as a state of ineffective communication, accompanied by interference and barriers, misinterpretations, and one-way communication. The study is based on 4701 environmental media texts from 16 mass media sources and 7 VK social communities in Chelyabinsk and Sverdlovsk regions for the period 2019-2023. The respondents are 305 people aged between 18 and 30 as the most active users of modern information technologies who receive information online and represent the largest group of the population consuming information from digital media. The analysis of environmental media coverage reveals the following gaps: thematic gaps that manifest in the thematic asymmetry of the information narrative; psycholinguistic as a predominance of negative headlines; political and organizational gaps expressing the uneven representation of the interests of environmental communication participants in the information agenda; reputation gaps as a lack of trust in information sources among the population; and behavioral gaps as a low involvement in solving environmental problems. The presence of communication gaps leads to insufficient interaction between participants in the communication process in solving environmental problems and its low efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2024.13(3).464-488
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the Environmental Agenda in Local Mass Media and Social Media in the Context of Social Communication Gaps

A.I. Demchenko, Anna Cheredniakova, Yulia Astashova, Lidiya Lobodenenko et al.
1 citations
Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism
Social Media and Politics
0.96
article

Analysis of the Environmental Agenda in Local Mass Media and Social Media in the Context of Social Communication Gaps

A.I. Demchenko, Anna Cheredniakova, Yulia Astashova, Lidiya Lobodenenko, A. A. Chuiduk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper deals with the analysis of the environmental agenda setting in local mass media, social media and emerging communication gaps. The theoretical and methodological basis for the study of environmental communication gaps is the theory of agenda setting and the factor model of mass communication by G. Maletzke, who takes into account the "pressure" of the mediator and various social and psychological characteristics of the subjects. The aim of the study is to analyze communication gaps in environmental agenda in mass media and social media in the Chelyabinsk and Sverdlovsk regions. The study applies a set of methods, namely comparative analysis, document analysis with the elements of content analysis, and a survey. Communication gap is understood as a state of ineffective communication, accompanied by interference and barriers, misinterpretations, and one-way communication. The study is based on 4701 environmental media texts from 16 mass media sources and 7 VK social communities in Chelyabinsk and Sverdlovsk regions for the period 2019-2023. The respondents are 305 people aged between 18 and 30 as the most active users of modern information technologies who receive information online and represent the largest group of the population consuming information from digital media. The analysis of environmental media coverage reveals the following gaps: thematic gaps that manifest in the thematic asymmetry of the information narrative; psycholinguistic as a predominance of negative headlines; political and organizational gaps expressing the uneven representation of the interests of environmental communication participants in the information agenda; reputation gaps as a lack of trust in information sources among the population; and behavioral gaps as a low involvement in solving environmental problems. The presence of communication gaps leads to insufficient interaction between participants in the communication process in solving environmental problems and its low efficiency.

Theoretical and Practical Issues of JournalismVol. 13(3)
South Ural State University (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Social Media and Politics
0.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.